MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in two local neurosurgical centres. The SPD group was performed in Hospital Umum Sarawak (HUS) and the SDD group was performed in Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru (HSAJB), from 1 January 2012 till 30 January 2014 with a total of 30 patients in both treatment groups.
RESULTS: Overall, there were no statistically significant difference in terms of patient general characteristics, pre-operative and post-operative symptoms, Markwalder grades, post-operative hematoma volume and recurrence, mortality and functional outcome at discharge and at three month follow-up between both groups. Albeit not achieving statistical significance, we observed a lower rate of surgical complication especially for post-operative intracranial hematoma with placement of the SPD system.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study concludes that both treatment methods proved to be highly effective in the treatment of CSDH. However, with a lower overall surgical complication rate, treatment with single burr-hole craniostomy, irrigation and placement of the SPD system can be considered a treatment of choice for the management of symptomatic CSDH.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019. All patients with TBI requiring urgent craniotomy were identified from the operating theatre registry, and the required data were extracted from their clinical notes, including the Glasgow Outcome Score (GCS) at discharge and 6 months later. Logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with poor outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in this study. The median door-to-skin time was 605 (interquartile range = 494-766) min. At discharge, 105 patients (68.2%) had poor outcomes. At the 6-month follow-up, only 58 patients (37.7%) remained to have poor outcomes. Simple logistic regression showed that polytrauma, hypotensive episode, ventilation, severe TBI, and the door-to-skin time were significantly associated with poor outcomes. After adjustments for the clinical characteristics in the analysis, the likelihood of having poor outcomes for every minute delay in the door-to-skin time increased at discharge (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.005; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002-1.008) and the 6-month follow-up (AOR = 1.008; 95% CI = 1.005-1.011).
CONCLUSION: The door-to-skin time is directly proportional to poor outcomes in patients with TBI. Concerted efforts from all parties involved in trauma care are essential in eliminating delays in surgical interventions and improving outcomes.
METHODS: Patients were selected randomly by convenience sampling. One hundred and twenty-four patients were included in the study. The mean age was 40.3 ± 18.5 years (95% CI: 37.2 to 43.8).
RESULTS: Among the common clinical problems were abdominal discomfort (23%), diarrhoea and vomiting (13%) and fever (13%). Reasons for OW admission included diagnostic uncertainty (63%) and short course of treatment (33%). The mean length of stay was 4.1 ± 1.8 hours (95% CI=3.8 to 4.4 hours). Most of the patients (85%) were discharged.
CONCLUSIONS: The OW of HUSM is effective in managing adult patients as determined by the hospitalisation rate and the length of stay.