Displaying publications 121 - 140 of 968 in total

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Chan SP, Ji LN, Nitiyanant W, Baik SH, Sheu WH
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2010 Aug;89(2):e30-2.
    PMID: 20541826 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.05.008
    Symptoms of hypoglycemia were reported by 35.8% of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents in the Asia-Pacific region. Symptoms were severe in 11.6% and very severe in 8.2% of patients experiencing hypoglycemia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism
  2. Tan F, Chan G, Wong JS, Rozario F
    Med J Malaysia, 2008 Aug;63(3):224-8.
    PMID: 19248695 MyJurnal
    We audited the standard of care provided to 200 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients attending our hospital general medical clinic. Data on diabetes related processes and outcome measures were collected. Annual testing rates (blood pressure 100%, fasting lipid profile 91.8%, HbA1c 69%) were higher compared to complications screening rates (Eye 69%, albuminuria 51%, foot 22.4%). Lifestyle intervention was lacking with BMI documented in 38.3% of patients and smoking history in 46%. Fifty percent and 41% of patients with HbA1c > 7.5% were referred to diabetes educator and dietitian respectively. For outcome measures, 26% of patients achieved HbA1c < or = 7%, 33% achieved BP < or = 130/80 while 56% achieved LDL < or = 2.6 mmol/L. Aspirin was prescribed in 78% and ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in 91.8% of patients. Lifestyle intervention and complication screening are the two major areas of deficiencies in the care of type 2 diabetic patients in our hospital general medical clinic.
    Study site: General medical clinic, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy*
  3. Sivalingam N
    Med J Malaysia, 2015 Aug;70(4):211-3.
    PMID: 26358015 MyJurnal
    No abstract available.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  4. Al-Aboudi IS, Hassali MA, Shafie AA, Hassan A, Alrasheedy AA
    SAGE Open Med, 2015;3:2050312115610129.
    PMID: 26770806 DOI: 10.1177/2050312115610129
    This study aimed to describe the health-related quality of life profile among type 2 diabetes patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  5. Lim TO
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 1991 Jul;12(3):201-7.
    PMID: 1889350 DOI: 10.1016/0168-8227(91)90078-R
    The prevalence, age at diagnosis, clinical characteristics and treatment of young diabetics, younger than 40 years were determined on the basis of a cross-sectional study of medical records of 2 health districts in Pahang, Malaysia. There were only 20 insulin-dependent diabetics (IDDM), prevalence 0.07 per 1000 inhabitants. There were 84 non-insulin-dependent diabetics (NIDDM), prevalence 0.3 per 1000 inhabitants. Three of the NIDDM patients could have malnutrition-related diabetes. Many NIDDM patients were asymptomatic which is an important reason why many of them remain undetected in the community. Seventy-four percent of the patients below the age of 30 years at diagnosis had NIDDM, 56% of the patients below the age of 20 years at diagnosis also had NIDDM and 54% of the NIDDM patients had a strong family history of diabetes. Many NIDDM patients were misdiagnosed as IDDM, especially if they were underweight, leading to considerable overuse of insulin. This study confirms that IDDM is rare in Malaysia, as in other Asian countries. Most young diabetics have NIDDM and have a strong family history. This pattern of diabetes in the young is unlike that seen in the West.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy
  6. Xu G, You D, Wong L, Duan D, Kong F, Zhang X, et al.
    Eur J Endocrinol, 2019 Apr;180(4):243-255.
    PMID: 30668524 DOI: 10.1530/EJE-18-0792
    Objective: Previous studies have shown sex-specific differences in all-cause and CHD mortality in type 2 diabetes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a global picture of the estimated influence of type 2 diabetes on the risk of all-cause and CHD mortality in women vs men.

    Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies published from their starting dates to Aug 7, 2018. The sex-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and their pooled ratio (women vs men) of all-cause and CHD mortality associated with type 2 diabetes were obtained through an inverse variance-weighted random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were used to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity.

    Results: The 35 analyzed prospective cohort studies included 2 314 292 individuals, among whom 254 038 all-cause deaths occurred. The pooled women vs men ratio of the HRs for all-cause and CHD mortality were 1.17 (95% CI: 1.12-1.23, I2 = 81.6%) and 1.97 (95% CI: 1.49-2.61, I2 = 86.4%), respectively. The pooled estimate of the HR for all-cause mortality was approximately 1.30 in articles in which the duration of follow-up was longer than 10 years and 1.10 in articles in which the duration of follow-up was less than 10 years. The pooled HRs for all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes was 2.33 (95% CI: 2.02-2.69) in women and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.72-2.12) in men, compared with their healthy counterparts.

    Conclusions: The effect of diabetes on all-cause and CHD mortality is approximately 17 and 97% greater, respectively, for women than for men.

    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology
  7. Citation: Practical Guide to Diabetes Management in Ramadan. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health, Malaysia; 2015

    Keywords: CPG
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  8. Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Andalib A, Nowacki AS, Jimenez A, Corcelles R, et al.
    Ann Surg, 2017 10;266(4):650-657.
    PMID: 28742680 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002407
    OBJECTIVE: To construct and validate a scoring system for evidence-based selection of bariatric and metabolic surgery procedures according to severity of type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

    BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) account for >95% of bariatric procedures in United States in patients with T2DM. To date, there is no validated model to guide procedure selection based on long-term glucose control in patients with T2DM.

    METHODS: A total of 659 patients with T2DM who underwent RYGB and SG at an academic center in the United States and had a minimum 5-year follow-up (2005-2011) were analyzed to generate the model. The validation dataset consisted of 241 patients from an academic center in Spain where similar criteria were applied.

    RESULTS: At median postoperative follow-up of 7 years (range 5-12), diabetes remission (HbA1C <6.5% off medications) was observed in 49% after RYGB and 28% after SG (P < 0.001). Four independent predictors of long-term remission including preoperative duration of T2DM (P < 0.0001), preoperative number of diabetes medications (P < 0.0001), insulin use (P = 0.002), and glycemic control (HbA1C < 7%) (P = 0.002) were used to develop the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS) score using a nomogram. Patients were then categorized into 3 stages of diabetes severity. In mild T2DM (IMS score ≤25), both procedures significantly improved T2DM. In severe T2DM (IMS score >95), when clinical features suggest limited functional β-cell reserve, both procedures had similarly low efficacy for diabetes remission. There was an intermediate group, however, in which RYGB was significantly more effective than SG, likely related to its more pronounced neurohormonal effects. Findings were externally validated and procedure recommendations for each severity stage were provided.

    CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported cohort (n = 900) with long-term postoperative glycemic follow-up, which, for the first time, categorizes T2DM into 3 validated severity stages for evidence-based procedure selection.

    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy
  9. Chew BH, Vos RC, Shariff Ghazali S, Shamsuddin NH, Fernandez A, Mukhtar F, et al.
    BMC Endocr Disord, 2017 Apr 04;17(1):22.
    PMID: 28376921 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-017-0172-8
    BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients experience many psychosocial problems related to their diabetes. These often lead to emotional disorders such as distress, stress, anxiety and depression, resulting in decreased self-care, quality of life and disease control. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief value-based emotion-focused educational programme in adults with T2DM on diabetes-related distress (DRD), depressive symptoms, illness perceptions, quality of life, diabetes self-efficacy, self-care and clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 10 public health clinics in Malaysia, all providing diabetes care according to national clinical practice guidelines. Patients' inclusion criteria: Malay, ≥ 18 years with T2DM for at least 2 years, on regular follow-up with one of three biomarkers HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol sub-optimally controlled, and with a mean 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17) score ≥ 3. The intervention consists of four sessions and one booster over a period of 4 months that provide information and skills to assist patients in having proper perceptions of their T2DM including an understanding of the treatment targets, understanding and managing their emotions and goal-setting. The comparator is an attention-control group with three meetings over a similar period. With an estimated intra-cluster correlation coefficient ρ of 0.015, a cluster size of 20 and 20% non-completion, the trial will need to enroll 198 patients.
    PRIMARY OUTCOME: the between groups difference in proportion of patients achieving a mean DDS-17 score 
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy*
  10. Lin SN, Phang KK, Toh SH, Chee KH, Zaman Huri H
    PMID: 32754118 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00448
    Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Antihyperglycemic drugs have interaction with heart failure among diabetic patients. To date, the data on real world use of diabetic medication in Malaysian heart failure patients with T2DM has not been elucidated. Objective: This study aims to identify the prescribing pattern of antihyperglycemic regimens in HF patients with T2DM, and to investigate the association between glycemic control and other factors such as demographic and clinical characteristics with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in these patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study involved patients diagnosed to have HF and T2DM who were seen in the outpatient clinic in a government tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Patients receiving at least one oral antidiabetic agent and/or insulin for at least 3 months prior were included. The differences and association between study outcomes were examined and analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test, One-Way ANOVA, Binary Logistic Regression and multiple Multinomial Logistic Regression models. Results: From July to December 2019, 194 patients were included in this study. The majority (52.1%) of the patients had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 20.6% had HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and 27.3% had HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Overall, metformin (59.8%) was the commonest antihyperglycemic agent prescribed, followed by insulins (54.0%), and sulphonylureas (44.9%). The most prescribed agents for HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF patients were metformin (65.3%), insulins (62.5%), and sulphonylureas (60.4%), respectively. The prescribing trend of sulphonylureas was found to be significantly associated with patients' LVEF status (p = 0.033). The odds for sulphonylurea prescription among the HFrEF patients were 2.42 times higher compared to the HFpEF patients [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-4.79]. There was no association found between glycemic control with patients' LVEF. Conclusion: Our findings reported metformin as the most commonly prescribed antihyperglycemic agent, sodium glucose linked transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor being under-prescribed, and detected poorly controlled diabetes in majority of patients with T2DM and HF. Understanding the prescribing pattern of antihyperglycemic agents supports the implementation of evidence-based treatment in HF patients with T2DM to improve patients' outcomes.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology*
  11. Devarajooh C, Chinna K
    PLoS One, 2017;12(3):e0175096.
    PMID: 28362861 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175096
    The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing in Malaysia, and people with diabetes have been reported to suffer from depression and diabetes distress which influences their self-efficacy in performing diabetes self-care practices. This interviewer administered, cross sectional study, conducted in the district of Hulu Selangor, Malaysia, involving 371 randomly selected patients with type 2 diabetes, recruited from 6 health clinics, aimed to examine a conceptual model regarding the association between depression, diabetes distress and self-efficacy with diabetes self-care practices using the partial least square approach of structural equation modeling. In this study, diabetes self-care practices were similar regardless of sex, age group, ethnicity, education level, diabetes complications or type of diabetes medication. This study found that self-efficacy had a direct effect on diabetes self-care practice (path coefficient = 0.438, p<0.001). Self-care was not directly affected by depression and diabetes distress, but indirectly by depression (path coefficient = -0.115, p<0.01) and diabetes distress (path coefficient = -0.122, p<0.001) via self-efficacy. In conclusion, to improve self-care practices, effort must be focused on enhancing self-efficacy levels, while not forgetting to deal with depression and diabetes distress, especially among those with poorer levels of self-efficacy.
    Study site: 6 primary health clinics (Klinik Kesihatan), Hulu Selangor. Selangor. Malaysia
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology
  12. Chew BH, Vos RC, Pouwer F, Rutten GEHM
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2018 Aug;142:74-84.
    PMID: 29802952 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.021
    AIMS: To examine whether diabetes distress (DD), when measured by three different instruments, was associated differently with self-efficacy, self-care activity, medication adherence and disease control in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study in three health clinics. DD was assessed with the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale, the 2-item DDS-2 (DDS-2) and the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5). Dependent variables included self-efficacy, self-care activities, medication adherence, HbA1c, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Multiple linear and logistic regression were used in analyses.
    RESULTS: In total 338 participants (56% women), with a mean age of 61 years and diabetes duration of 9.8 years, were included. DDS-2 was an independent determinant of SBP (β = 1.89, 95% CI 0.14, 3.64), DBP (β = 1.19, 95% CI 0.16, 2.21) and blood pressure target (OR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.12, 3.83). PAID-5 was an independent determinant of medication adherence (adjusted β = -0.05, 95% CI -0.08, -0.01) and self-care activities (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.26, 0.99).
    CONCLUSIONS: Associations of DD with important aspects of diabetes care are substantially influenced by confounders and depend on the way DD is measured. Our findings call for a judicious use of different DD measures in clinical practice and research. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02730754).
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy*
  13. Siew Tin, Tan, Mohd-Sidik, Sherina, Lekhraj, Rampal, Normala, Ibrahim, Kit-Aun, Tan, Zuriati, Ibrahim
    MyJurnal
    As reported by the World Health Organisation (2014), Malaysia is the fattest country among the Southeast Asia. Among others, obesity is a leading contributor of non-communicable diseases (e.g., type II diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cancer). This article aims to review the exiting weight management programmes targeting overweight and obesity in Malaysia from 2005 to 2015. The findings from this review could be useful for future intervention efforts in an attempt to address such issues in Malaysia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  14. Ismail, N., Mohd Ali, S. S., Swaminathan, D.
    Ann Dent, 2013;20(1):8-12.
    MyJurnal
    A preliminary investigation to assess the relationship
    in the severity of periodontal disease in diabetics when
    compared with non-diabetic subjects. Materials and
    Methods: A retrospective, comparative study using
    periodontal case notes of 40 subjects (20 Type 2 diabetics,
    20 non-diabetics) who were selected based on the
    inclusion and exclusion criteria. Severity of periodontal
    disease was assessed through number of periodontal
    pocket ≥5mm. The results were compared between
    subjects whose age, gender and plaque scores are matched
    with the test group. Data obtained was then analyzed by
    SPSS Version 12. Results: When comparisons were made
    between test (Type 2 diabetic) and control (non-diabetic)
    groups, there were no significant difference (p>0.05) in
    the severity of periodontal disease. However, there was
    a clinically mean difference between the two groups.
    Conclusions: This preliminary investigation indicated
    that the severity of chronic periodontitis, as indicated in
    periodontal pocketing, increased in diabetic patients when
    compared to non-diabetics clinically, although it was not
    statistically significant. The finding of this investigation
    was thus not conclusive as it was only a retrospective
    study using patients’ case notes. However, the results
    are now being further investigated with a proper clinical
    trial which examines periodontal parameters and diabetic
    status (HbA1c) of the subjects to determine the association
    between periodontal disease and diabetes mellitus.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  15. Jaganathan R, Ravindran R, Dhanasekaran S
    Can J Diabetes, 2018 Aug;42(4):446-456.e1.
    PMID: 29229313 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.040
    Adipose tissue is an enormously active endocrine organ, secreting various hormones, such as adiponectin, leptin, resistin and visfatin, together with classical cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). All these adipocytokines play significant roles in the regulation of energy metabolism, glucose and lipid metabolism, reproduction, cardiovascular function and immunity. Adipocytokines are significantly regulated by nutritional status and can directly influence other organ systems, including brain, liver and skeletal muscle. Adiponectin plays a key role as an anti-inflammatory hormone. Upregulated expression of resistin, vaspin, apelin and TNF-α plays a significant role in induction of insulin resistance linked with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Ghrelin, the circulating peptide, has been found to stimulate appetite and regulate energy balance. Thus, it can be considered 1 of the candidate genes for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Omentin is a novel adipokine produced by visceral adipose tissue. Circulating levels of omentin are decreased in insulin-resistant states, for example, in obesity and diabetes. IL-6 plays a vital role in regulating the accumulation of lipids intramyocardially. Based on the biologic relevance of these adipocytokines, they can no longer be considered as energy storage sites alone but must also be considered in metabolic control. Hence, the present review summarizes the regulatory roles of adipocytokines in diabetes linked with obesity.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology
  16. Kalra S, Kamaruddin NA, Visvanathan J, Santani R
    Eur Endocrinol, 2019 Aug;15(2):67-69.
    PMID: 31616495 DOI: 10.17925/EE.2019.15.2.67
    This communication shares insights into the definition of disease progression and drug durability in type 2 diabetes. Disease progression may be defined as gradual worsening of beta-cell function, clinically observed as an increase in drug dosage, drug frequency or number of glucose lowering drugs needed to maintain HbA1c control; and/or a ≥0.5% rise in HbA1c, unexplained by acute, modifiable factors, while using the same drug regimen; and/or as the occurrence or worsening of cardiovascular or microvascular complications, in spite of standard care, over a pre-specified time period. Durability of a drug or a drug combination may be defined as its ability to postpone or delay progression of disease, in a safe and well tolerated manner. Thus, all drugs that are able to prevent disease progression (i.e., postpone loss of glycaemic control, need for intensification of therapy or onset or worsening of complications) may be termed 'durable'.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  17. Citation: Medical Nutrition Therapy Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes, Second Edition. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Dietitians' Association; 2013
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  18. Ismail F
    ISBN: 978-983-3433-58-2
    Citation: Quality of Diabetes Care at MOH Healthcare Facilities: SIQ Investigation Guideline, Fifth Edition. Putrajaya: Ministry of Health, Malaysia; 2011
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  19. Aljunid SM, Aung YN, Ismail A, Abdul Rashid SAZ, Nur AM, Cheah J, et al.
    PLoS One, 2019;14(10):e0211248.
    PMID: 31652253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211248
    This study mainly aims to identify the direct cost and economic burden of hypoglycemia for patients with type II diabetes mellitus in Malaysia. A cross-sectional study explored the cost incurred for hypoglycemia among patients admitted to University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC). The study covered patients aged 20-79 years hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ICD-10 hypoglycemia and discharged between January 2010 and September 2015 according to the casemix database. A costing analysis was done through a step-down approach from the perspective of health providers. Cost data were collected for three levels of cost centers with the help of a hospital-costing template. The costing data from UKMMC were used to estimate the national burden of hypoglycemia among type II diabetics for the whole country. Of 244 diabetes patients admitted primarily for hypoglycemia to UKMMC, 52% were female and 88% were over 50 years old. The cost increased with severity. Managing a hypoglycemic case requires five days (median) of inpatient stay on average, with a range of 2-26 days, and costs RM 8,949 (USD 2,289). Of the total cost, 30% related to ward (final cost center), 16% to ICU, and 15% to pharmacy (secondary-level cost center) services. Considering that 3.2% of all admissions were hypoglycemia related, the total annual cost of hypoglycemia care for adult diabetics in Malaysia is estimated at RM 117.4 (USD 30.0) million, which translates to 0.5% of the Ministry of Health budget. Hypoglycemia imposes a substantial economic impact even without the direct and indirect cost incurred by patients and other cost of complications. Diabetic management needs to include proper diabetic care and health education to reduce episodes of hypoglycemia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics*; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology
  20. Hassan, B. M.
    MyJurnal
    As primary care doctors, treating patients with Type 2 DM is our bread and butter, as the majority of them seek treatment at health clinics. It is true that some of the patients have managed to achieve good glycaemic control, but more than half of them still have poorly controlled blood sugar as compared to the clinical practice guideline recommendation [1]. And usually, the first thing that comes to our mind when seeing these patients is to increase the dosage of anti-diabetic medication that they are currently on or to add another agent, including insulin. We also frequently tell them that the high blood sugar level is not surprising, as such is the nature of diabetes, where the worsening of blood sugar is expected due to progressive deterioration of pancreatic beta cell function.
    Matched MeSH terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links