Materials and Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 100 patients who wanted single-rooted teeth to be extracted (which failed endodontically). The participants have been randomized into two equal groups named as - (i) a periotome group (ii) and a piezotome group. Duration of the surgery, postoperative pain within 7 days, complications (if any) associated with the extraction process were performed as a part of clinical assessment. Bone loss has been analyzed 6 months after the surgery radiographically. The data have been recorded and analyzed using the version 22.0 of the SPSS software package.
Results: All parameters in the periotome category (P < 0.05) were statistically significant except for bone loss and gingival laceration in comparison to piezotome group. In the piezotome group, a longer time was observed for surgery and delayed pain control was achieved. In our study, we found statistically significant more marginal bone loss in piezotome group in comparison with periotome group.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that for intraoperative and postoperative comfort periotome could be used as a safer and cheaper option for atraumatic extractions but piezosurgery may prove as a better choice soon for surgeries in the maxillofacial region to maintain soft-tissue integrity.
METHODS: The system typically consists of segmenting the calcium region from the CT scan into slices based on Hounsfield Unit-based threshold, and subsequently computing the summation of the calcium areas in each slice. However, when the carotid volume has intermittently higher concentration of contrast agent, a dependable approach is adapted to correct the calcium region using the neighboring slices, thereby estimating the correct volume. Furthermore, mitigation is provided following the regulatory constraints by changing the system to semi-automated criteria as a fall back solution. We evaluate the automated and semi-automated techniques using completely manual calcium volumes computed based on the manual tracings by the neuroradiologist.
RESULTS: A total of 64 patients with calcified plaque in the internal carotid artery were analyzed. Using the above algorithm, our automated and semi-automated system yields correlation coefficients (CC) of 0.89 and 0.96 against first manual readings and 0.90 and 0.96 against second manual readings, respectively. Using the t-test, there was no significant difference between the automated and semi-automated methods against manual. The intra-observer reliability was excellent with CC 0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to automated method, the semi-automated method for calcium volume is acceptable and closer to manual strategy for calcium volume. Further work evaluating and confirming the performance of our semi-automated protocol is now warranted.