CASE REPORT: A 58-year-old female presented with a 3-cm painless right axillary mass. Extensive radiological investigations that include mammography, ultrasonography of the breasts and positron emission tomography (PET) scan failed to conclude the primary site of the tumour. Histological examination of the lymph node revealed loosely cohesive sheets of poorly differentiated malignant cells, without discernible glandular or squamous differentiation. Immunohistochemically, the malignant cells exhibited diffuse immunoreactivity toward pan-cytokeratin and CK7, while leukocyte common antigen, S100 and CK20 were negative. A second panel of immunomarkers was carried out. The malignant cells expressed breast-specific markers (GATA-3, GCDFP-15 and mammaglobin), and were negative for ER, PR and TTF-1 immunohistochemistry. A diagnosis of OBC was rendered.
DISCUSSION: Breast primary must always be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with sole presentation of axillary lymphadenopathy. The breast-specific immunomarkers play a pivotal role in the diagnosis of ER, PR-negative occult breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The miR-302 cluster was amplified by polymerase chain reaction technique from human genomic DNA and was ligated into pTRIPz, an inducible lentiviral vector.
RESULTS: MRC5 fibroblasts and HEK293 (human embryonic kidney) cells were infected with pTRIPz-302 cluster lentivirus and the family of 302 miRNAs were strongly expressed in HEK293 cells but lowly expressed in MRC5 fibroblasts. When cultured in hESC conditions, MRC5 cells expressed only low levels of DNMT3B, Nanog, Oct4 and Lin28 and failed to show stem cell induction. The red fluorescent expression seen in the majority of MRC5 cells, indicated that the rate of infection by lentivirus was efficient.
DISCUSSION: The efficiency of reprogramming may be improved perhaps by either using a different cell type or a high expression vector with a different type of promoter.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study over a seven-month duration recruiting all patients with clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis and/or maternal intrapartum pyrexia. The distribution and the degree of cord inflammation were assessed. The cases were also evaluated for maternal inflammatory response (MIR) and chorionic vasculitis (CV).
RESULTS: Of the 191 placentas, 88 (46.1%) had some degree of cord inflammation. Forty-nine (55.7%) had a differential in cord inflammation, with distal cord section (n = 38) demonstrating significant greater inflammation than that of proximal cord section (n = 11) (p<0.001). There were 20 cases with phlebitis only and 8 cases demonstrated arteritis only in either proximal or distal cord sections. Increasing magnitude of cord inflammation was significantly associated with increasing severity of MIR and the rate of CV (p<0.001). CV was observed in 25 (24.3%) cases showing absence of cord inflammation, while 12 (13.6%) cases with cord FIR demonstrated no CV.
DISCUSSION: Inflammatory reaction can occur variably throughout the length of the umbilical cord and chorionic plate vessels, with greater inflammation seen in the distal cord section. We affirm the current Amsterdam recommendation of submitting at least two cross sections of the cord representing proximal and distal sites and two sections from placental parenchyma to facilitate the identification of FIR.