METHODOLOGY: Data were collected form 5310 patients in 249 private clinics. The patients evaluated their satisfaction on the quality of service on the basis of nine criteria that comprised 31 subcriteria. We used multicriteria satisfaction analysis (MUSA) to analyze the data.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION: The data analysis results showed low level of satisfaction on the health care quality services offered by the private clinics in Yemen. The majority of the criteria and subcriteria showed low level of satisfaction, high demand, and high mandate for improvement.
METHODS: The review spanned 1997 to 2023, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases like PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literature. Selection criteria covered English-language journals, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, and professional organizational standards, revealing key aspects of MQSA and breast cancer diagnostics in the USA.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: MQSA's legislative aspects guarantee the effectiveness of regulations for high-quality mammography. It addresses technology, emphasizes inspections, and balances compliance with healthcare burdens. Procedural guidelines prioritize patient outcomes, minimize errors, and address access disparities. Regular updates are crucial to align screening services with technological changes, maintaining safety and accuracy nationwide.
CONCLUSION: The FDA's collaboration with stakeholders, including medical specialists and patient advocacy groups, has contributed to crucial legislative aspects of MQSA. The accuracy of mammography screenings has significantly improved by MQSA's installation of stringent quality and regulatory standards. Compliance with MQSA guidelines led to higher accuracy, safety, and better detection rates. Ongoing efforts must aim to refine guidelines, address emerging challenges, and optimize breast cancer detection.
METHOD: Four hundred and twenty-three subjects were recruited from center records using a systematic random sampling technique. Subjects who consented were interviewed by telephone using a specially designed semi-structured questionnaire. Descriptive as well as comparative analyses were carried out. Differences between groups were tested using the Chi-square test when applicable.
RESULTS: The majority of users surveyed (89.6%) had called the center from within Khartoum State and 10.4% of users had called from other states. Of the enquiries, 36.1% were from pharmacists, 29.5% from physicians, and 22.3% from laypersons. The vast majority (93.1%) of respondents were educated to degree level or higher. Approximately one fifth, one half, and one third of the users surveyed had consulted the center >5 times, 2-5 times, and once, respectively. More than 90% of users rated the services provided as good to excellent and 94.7% declared their probable intention to continue utilizing the center in the future.
CONCLUSION: The center succeeded in satisfying and retaining its users by providing an acceptable quality of service.