OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of acupuncture (e.g. needle acupuncture with or without electrical stimulation; laser acupuncture; non-penetrating types of manual or embedded acupressure) on mortality and morbidity in neonates with HIE, compared with 1) no treatment, 2) placebo or sham treatment, 3) any pharmacologic treatment, or 4) different types of acupuncture.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP in March 2023. We conducted a search of the grey literature to identify reports of trials conducted by or referenced in research by CORDIS EU, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and NHSGGC Paediatrics for Health Professionals. We also checked the reference lists of relevant articles to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs and cluster-randomized trials. We included studies where participants were term infants (37 weeks or greater) and late preterm infants (34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation) 10 days of age or less, with evidence of peripartum asphyxia. We included studies on acupuncture (e.g. needle acupuncture with or without electrical stimulation; laser acupuncture; non-penetrating types of manual or embedded acupressure). We included studies where acupuncture was compared with: 1) no treatment; 2) placebo or sham treatment; 3) any pharmacologic treatment; or 4) different types of acupuncture.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality at the latest follow-up, major neurodevelopmental disability in children aged 18 to 24 months and aged 3 to 5 years, adverse events until hospital discharge, and length of hospital stay.
MAIN RESULTS: We included four studies (enrolling 464 infants) that compared acupuncture with no treatment. The studies ranged in size from 60 to 200 infants. Three studies were conducted in China and one in Russia. None of the four studies reported on any of the prespecified outcomes of our review. We did not identify any ongoing studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is limited availability of studies addressing this specific population. The included studies did not assess mortality, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, or adverse effects of acupuncture. We are unable to draw any conclusions about the benefits and harms of acupuncture for HIE in neonates. In light of the current limitations, clinicians are urged to approach the use of acupuncture in neonates with HIE cautiously, as there is no evidence to support its routine application. The available trials assessed surrogate outcomes that have a relatively small impact on newborns, and failed to report important outcomes such as mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Other available trials were performed on older infants who had experienced neonatal HIE. Given the lack of available evidence, well-designed randomized controlled trials with relevant outcomes such as mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes are essential to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for HIE in neonates.
METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective cohort study. Shortly after birth, cranial ultrasonography was carried out via the anterior fontanelles of 70 normal control infants and 104 asphyxiated infants with a history of fetal distress and Apgar scores of less than 6 at 1 and 5 min of life, or requiring endotracheal intubation and manual intermittent positive pressure ventilation for at least 5 min after birth. Neurodevelopmental assessment was carried out on the survivors at 1 year of age.
RESULTS: Abnormal cranial ultrasound changes were detected in a significantly higher proportion (79.8%, or n = 83) of asphyxiated infants than controls (39.5%, or n = 30) (P < 0.0001). However, logistic regression analysis showed that only three factors were significantly associated with adverse outcome at 1 year of life among the asphyxiated infants. These were: (i) decreasing birthweight (for every additional gram of increase in birthweight, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.999, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998, 1.000; P = 0.047); (ii) a history of receiving ventilatory support during the neonatal period (adjusted OR = 8.3; 95%CI 2.4, 28.9; P = 0.0009); and (iii) hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy stage 2 or 3 (adjusted OR = 5.8; 95%CI 1.8, 18.6; P = 0.003). None of the early cranial ultrasound changes was a significant predictor.
CONCLUSIONS: Early cranial ultrasound findings, although common in asphyxiated infants, were not significant predictors of adverse outcome during the first year of life in asphyxiated term infants.