MyMedR

Displaying publications 1 - 20 of 65 in total

Abstract:

Sort:

Elder Abuse and Neglect Intervention in the Clinical Setting: Perceptions and Barriers Faced by Primary Care Physicians in Malaysia

Mohd Mydin FH, Othman S

J Interpers Violence, 2020 11;35(23-24):6041-6066.
PMID: 29294874 DOI: 10.1177/0886260517726411

This qualitative study attempts to explore the definition, perceptions, practice experience, and barriers of primary care physicians (PCPs) in identifying and intervening in cases of elder abuse and neglect at the primary care level. Semistructured in-depth interview was conducted among 10 PCPs. Participants were selected by purposive sampling. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. In general, PCPs showed consistency in defining elder abuse and neglect. PCPs considered that they were optimally positioned to intervene in cases of elder abuse and neglect, but indicated the potential of overlooking such problems. The hurdles faced by PCPs in the identification and intervention of elder abuse were determined to be occurring at three levels: clinical, organizational, and policy. At the clinical level, PCPs recognize that they are lacking both the confidence and knowledge of elder abuse and neglect intervention. PCPs' conflicting personal and professional beliefs create barriers during the clinical practice. Time constraints, patients' other clinical problems, and, in addition, the preservation of a good doctor-patient relationship overshadow the importance of addressing and intervening in elder abuse and neglect issues during the consultation. This is further exacerbated by the barriers perceived by the patients: their nondisclosure and reluctance to accept outside intervention. At the organizational level, the lack of efficient interagency networks or support for the health system poses barriers. At the policy level, the absence of legislation specifically addressing elder abuse also creates considerable difficulties. However, PCPs gave differing responses when asked about a law concerning the elderly and mandatory reporting. Addressing these multilevel barriers is critical for ensuring that opportunities arising at the primary care level for elder maltreatment intervention are correctly utilized.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care*
Fulltext Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives on Identifying Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

Abdul-Hamid H, Kai J, Anis Safura R

Ann Fam Med, 2023 Jan 01.
PMID: 37037012 DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.4220

Context Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common autosomal dominant disorder, causing elevated cholesterol from birth, premature heart disease, and early death. Objective This study explored primary care physicians' experiences and perspectives on identifying FH in Malaysian primary care. Study Design and Analysis A qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 22 primary care physicians (PCPs) in two primary care clinic settings. The interviews and focus group discussions were audio recorded, and the recordings were transcribed verbatim. The data in the transcripts were analysed using thematic approach. Setting Primary Care Clinics Population Studied Primary Care Physicians in two primary care clinics. Intervention A qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions Outcome Measures Primary Care Physicians' perceptions and experiences of identifying individuals at high risk of FH in their clinical practice, and the acceptability and perceived challenges of trying to do this were explored during the interviews and focus group discussions. Findings PCPs felt there was potential for FH to be identified earlier in primary care. They had some existing knowledge and awareness of diagnostic criteria for FH but highlighted several challenges. In their practice, this included limited time in routine clinical care, availability of medication and clinical expertise; and critical lack of family history and physical examination findings in health records. The barriers on a systemic level were shortage of lipid specialist services and the absence of local care pathways for FH. The PCPs recommended a user-friendly case-finding tool for FH, and establishing FH registry and clinical practice guideline in Malaysia, alongside a national FH screening strategy and awareness campaigns for both clinicians and general public. Conclusions PCPs are positive about improving the identification of FH in primary care. However greater support in their practice and wider system developments and change are needed.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care*
mHealth adoption among primary care physicians in Malaysia and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study

Lim HM, Dunn AG, Muhammad Firdaus Ooi S, Teo CH, Abdullah A, Woo WJ, et al.

Fam Pract, 2021 06 17;38(3):210-217.
PMID: 32968795 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa103

BACKGROUND: mHealth apps potentially improve health care delivery and patient outcomes, but the uptake of mHealth in primary care is challenging, especially in low-middle-income countries.
OBJECTIVE: To measure factors associated with mHealth adoption among primary care physicians (PCPs) in Malaysia.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted among PCPs. The usage of mHealth apps by the PCPs has divided into the use of mHealth apps to support PCPs' clinical work and recommendation of mHealth apps for patient's use. Factors associated with mHealth adoption were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among 217 PCPs in the study, 77.0% used mHealth apps frequently for medical references, 78.3% medical calculation and 30.9% interacting with electronic health records (EHRs). Only 22.1% of PCPs frequently recommended mHealth apps to patients for tracking health information, 22.1% patient education and 14.3% use as a medical device. Performance expectancy and facilitating conditions were associated with mHealth use for medical references. Family medicine trainees, working in a government practice and performance expectancy were the facilitators for the use of mHealth apps for medical calculation. Internet connectivity, performance expectancy and use by colleagues were associated with the use of mHealth with EHR. Performance expectancy was associated with mHealth apps' recommendation to patients to track health information and provide patient education.
CONCLUSIONS: PCPs often used mHealth apps to support their clinical work but seldom recommended mHealth apps to their patients. Training for PCPs is needed on the appraisal and knowledge of the mHealth apps for patient use.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care*
Editorial. Encouraging primary care physicians to contribute to the journal

Md Shajahan MY

Family Physician, 1994;6:3-3.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Fulltext Knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians regarding childhood hearing loss in Malaysia

Mazlan R, Othman S

PLoS One, 2023;18(12):e0295972.
PMID: 38127879 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295972

BACKGROUND: Childhood hearing loss is a significant health concern. Early identification and intervention are essential to maximize hearing potential and developmental outcomes, with primary care physicians (PCPs) playing a pivotal role in this process.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess PCPs' knowledge and attitudes toward childhood hearing loss, investigate the association between knowledge and attitudes, and examine the influence of demographic factors on PCPs' knowledge and attitudes towards childhood hearing loss.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from 30 November 2017 to 30 July 2018 at three public health clinics in Malaysia, specifically in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, and Terengganu. A self-administered questionnaire assessed PCPs' knowledge of general facts, diagnosis and intervention, and risk factors for childhood hearing loss. Additionally, the questionnaire evaluated PCPS' attitudes across cognitive, affective, and behavioural domains regarding childhood hearing loss.
RESULTS: Most participants lacked sufficient knowledge about childhood hearing loss, with 61.4% not seeing it as a major health issue. Almost half (45.9%) didn't know that children with hearing loss can succeed in regular schools, and 78% were unaware that hearing aids don't fully restore normal hearing. Participants' awareness of risk factors varied widely, ranging from 24.6% to 90.3%. Despite these knowledge gaps, participants generally had positive attitudes towards childhood hearing loss, especially in cognitive and behavioural aspects. The study found a strong positive link between knowledge and attitudes, but demographic factors didn't significantly affect them.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the urgent need to address knowledge gaps among Malaysian PCPs regarding childhood hearing loss. While these knowledge gaps exist, PCPs' positive attitudes form a foundation for developing targeted educational interventions to improve PCPs' knowledge and skills in managing childhood hearing loss. Collaborative efforts are essential to translate these findings into meaningful improvements in paediatric audiological care.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care*
Fulltext Roles of primary care physicians in managing bipolar disorders in adults

Awaluddin A, Jali N, Bahari R, Jamil Z, Haron N

Malays Fam Physician, 2015;10(3):27-31.
PMID: 27570605 MyJurnal

Management of bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging due to its multiple and complex facets of presentations as well as various levels of interventions. There is also limitation of treatment accessibility especially at the primary care level. Local evidence-based clinical practice guidelines address the importance of integrated care of BD at various levels. Primary care physicians hold pertinent role in maintaining remission and preventing relapse by providing systematic monitoring of people with BD. Pharmacological treatment in particular mood stabilisers remain the most effective management with psychosocial interventions as adjunct. This paper highlights the role of primary care physicians in the management of BD.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Role of the general practitioner in the management of psychiatric disorders

Subramaniam M

Family Practitioner, 1988;11:13-16.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Fulltext Variation of polypharmacy in older primary care attenders occurs at prescriber level

Ong SM, Lim YMF, Sivasampu S, Khoo EM

BMC Geriatr, 2018 02 23;18(1):59.
PMID: 29471806 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0750-2

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is particularly important in older persons as they are more likely to experience adverse events compared to the rest of the population. Despite the relevance, there is a lack of studies on the possible association of patient, prescriber and practice characteristics with polypharmacy. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the rate of polypharmacy among older persons attending public and private primary care clinics, and its association with patient, prescriber and practice characteristics.
METHODS: We used data from The National Medical Care Survey (NMCS), a national cross-sectional survey of patients' visits to primary care clinics in Malaysia. A weighted total of 22,832 encounters of patients aged ≥65 years were analysed. Polypharmacy was defined as concomitant use of five medications and above. Multilevel logistic regression was performed to examine the association of polypharmacy with patient, prescriber and practice characteristics.
RESULTS: A total of 20.3% of the older primary care attenders experienced polypharmacy (26.7%% in public and 11.0% in private practice). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of polypharmacy were 6.37 times greater in public practices. Polypharmacy was associated with patients of female gender (OR 1.49), primary education level (OR 1.61) and multimorbidity (OR 14.21). The variation in rate of polypharmacy was mainly found at prescriber level.
CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy is common among older persons visiting primary care practices. Given the possible adverse outcomes, interventions to reduce the burden of polypharmacy are best to be directed at individual prescribers.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care/standards; Physicians, Primary Care/trends*; Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data
Fulltext Knowledge, confidence and attitude of primary care doctors in managing in-flight medical emergencies: a cross-sectional survey

Ng WL, Abdullah N

Singapore Med J, 2020 Feb;61(2):81-85.
PMID: 32152640 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020016

INTRODUCTION: Medical emergencies occur at a rate of one in 604‒753 flights. Doctors travelling on commercial flights may encounter an in-flight medical emergency requiring their assistance. There is a paucity of studies on how confident primary care doctors are in managing in-flight medical emergencies. This study aimed to determine the knowledge, confidence and attitude of primary care doctors in managing in-flight medical emergencies.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on all primary care doctors working in government health clinics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from October 2016 to November 2016. A self-reported questionnaire was used, which included questions on demographic information, knowledge of in-flight medicine, and the attitude and confidence of primary care doctors in managing in-flight medical emergencies.
RESULTS: 182 doctors completed the questionnaire (92.9% response rate). The mean knowledge score was 8.9 out of a maximum score of 20. Only 11.5% of doctors felt confident managing in-flight medical emergencies. The majority (69.2%) would assist in an in-flight medical emergency, but the readiness to assist was reduced if someone else was already helping or if they were not familiar with the emergency. Total knowledge score was positively associated with confidence in managing in-flight medical emergencies (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Only one in ten primary care doctors in this study felt confident managing in-flight medical emergencies. A higher total knowledge score of in-flight medical emergencies was positively associated with greater confidence in managing them. Educational programmes to address this gap in knowledge may be useful to improve doctors' confidence in managing in-flight medical emergencies.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care/psychology*; Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data*
Fulltext A comparison of evidence-based medicine practices between primary care physicians in rural and urban primary care settings in Malaysia: a qualitative study

Hisham R, Liew SM, Ng CJ

BMJ Open, 2018 Jul 12;8(7):e018933.
PMID: 30002004 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018933

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the evidence-based practices of primary care physicians between those working in rural and in urban primary care settings.
RESEARCH DESIGN: Data from two previous qualitative studies, the Front-line Equitable Evidence-based Decision Making in Medicine and Creating, Synthesising and Implementing evidence-based medicine (EBM) in primary care studies, were sorted, arranged, classified and compared with the help of qualitative research software, NVivo V.10. Data categories were interrogated through comparison between and within datasets to identify similarities and differences in rural and urban practices. Themes were then refined by removing or recoding redundant and infrequent nodes into major key themes.
PARTICIPANTS: There were 55 primary care physicians who participated in 10 focus group discussions (n=31) and 9 individual physician in-depth interviews.
SETTING: The study was conducted across three primary care settings-an academic primary care practice and both private and public health clinics in rural (Pahang) and urban (Selangor and Kuala Lumpur) settings in Malaysia.
RESULTS: We identified five major themes that influenced the implementation of EBM according to practice settings, namely, workplace factors, EBM understanding and awareness, work experience and access to specialist placement, availability of resources and patient population. Lack of standardised care is a contributing factor to differences in EBM practice, especially in rural areas.
CONCLUSIONS: There were major differences in the practice of EBM between rural and urban primary care settings. These findings could be used by policy-makers, administrators and the physicians themselves to identify strategies to improve EBM practices that are targeted according to workplace settings.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care/organization & administration; Physicians, Primary Care/psychology*
Fulltext Factors influencing the role of primary care providers as gatekeepers in the Malaysian public healthcare system

Ang KT, Ho BK, Mimi O, Salmah N, Salmiah MS, Noridah MS

Malays Fam Physician, 2014;9(3):2-11.
PMID: 26425299 MyJurnal

Primary care providers play an important gatekeeping role in ensuring appropriate referrals to secondary care facilities. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the level, pattern and rate of referrals from health clinics to hospitals in the public sector, and whether the placement of resident family medicine specialist (FMS) had made a significant difference. The study was carried out between March and April in 2012, involving 28 public primary care clinics. It showed that the average referral rate was 1.56% for clinics with resident FMS and 1.94% for those without resident FMS, but it was not statistically significant. Majority of referred cases were considered appropriate (96.1%). Results of the multivariate analysis showed that no prior consultation with senior healthcare provider and illnesses that were not severe and complex were independently associated with inappropriate referrals. Severity, complexity or uncertain diagnosis of patients' illness or injury significantly contributed to unavoidable referrals. Adequate facilities or having more experienced doctors could have avoided 14.5% of the referrals. The low referral rate and very high level of appropriate referrals could indicate that primary care providers in the public sector played an effective role as gatekeepers in the Malaysian public healthcare system.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Fulltext Osteoporosis awareness among primary care physicians in Malaysia

Das Gupta E, Goh EM, Gun SC, Hussein H, Shahril NS, Yeap SS, et al.

EXCLI J, 2013;12:521-2.
PMID: 27034635
Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Fulltext Pathways to mental healthcare in high-income and low-income countries

Sorketti EA, Zuraida NZ, Habil MH

Int Psychiatry, 2013 May;10(2):45-47.
PMID: 31507730

Understanding the way in which people seek care for mental disorders is important for planning services, training and referral mechanisms. Pathways to care fall broadly into three categories: via primary care physicians; via native healers; and via patient choice (patients can have direct access to mental health professionals). The pattern and nature of access to service in low-income countries are different from those in high-income countries. In many societies, deep-seated cultural beliefs on the part of patients and families about the causes of mental disorders are a major barrier to the receipt of modern psychiatric care.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Knowledge of osteoporosis among primary care doctors in Malaysia. [Abstract]

Das Gupta E, Goh EML, Gun SC, Hussein H, Shahril NS, Yeap SS

APLAR Journal of Rheumatology, 2006;9 Suppl 1:A53.

Background: In the ageing population, osteoporosis (OP) is becoming an increasingly common medical condition. Effective interventions are available that should enable clinicians to limit the magnitude of the burden but this will require the proper knowledge of OP and its management. Objective: To explore family physicians' perceptions of OP and to identify their educational needs in this area.
Method: Self administered questionnaires about OP knowledge and management were distributed to attendees of Rheumatology Workshops for primary care physicians between March and November 2005, in Malaysia.
Results: A total of 134 primary care physicians participated in this survey comprising 53% private practitioners, 44% government doctors, 2.2% from academic institutions and 0.7% not stated. The majority 73 (54.4%) had practiced for more than 10 years, 29 (21.6%) under 5 years and 32 (23.9%) between 5 and 10 years. 127 (94.4%) of them saw patients with osteoporosis. Those who had qualified for over 10 years were more likely to treat OP (p = 0.012). 82% felt that osteoporosis was under-diagnosed whereas 14.9% thought it was over diagnosed. This was not related to specialty or years qualified. Regarding the reasons for under-diagnosis of osteoporosis, 71% stated that they had no access to DXA screening, 74% had no access to heel ultrasound, 66% felt the disease was asymptomatic, 37% felt that investigations were costly and only 11% perceived the problem as a lack of referral for specialist opinion. Majority of respondents recognized the risk factors for OP such as increasing age (93%), post menopausal state (90%), positive family history (70%) and a previous low trauma fracture (65%). 7% were not sure how to further investigate a case of OP. For all categories of bone density, under 50% would advise changes in life-style measures. For osteopenia, 65.7% recommended calcium, 54.5% activated vitamin D products. For OP, 79.1% would use bisphosphonates, 50% calcium. In established OP, 80.6% would use bisphosphonates, 44% calcium. Usage of HRT and SERMs ranged between 20% and 30% in all categories. 63% were aware of the Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Osteoporosis. 22% would not refer to a specialist, whereas 50.4% would refer severe cases only. Almost all (98%) requested for further continuing medical education on OP.
Conclusions: In this study, the majority of primary care physicians had a reasonable working knowledge of the management of OP. However, 71% had no access to DXA. Therefore, awareness needs to be supplemented by adequate facilities to further improve the management of OP in the community.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Lo, the ever confounding nipple shadow!

Boo WH, Chan YC

Malays Fam Physician, 2020;15(3):79-82.
PMID: 33329866

The discovery of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) on chest imaging can be alarming for both the clinician and the patient. In the absence of a uniform guideline, managing SPN is nothing short of challenging for primary care physicians (PCPs). We present a case here of a patient presenting with prolonged cough who also displayed unilateral SPN on her chest radiograph. Through further examination, this presence was later shown to be a nipple shadow simulating SPN, and the patient was spared unnecessary testing and psychological distress.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Fulltext WHO 2009 guidelines for anti-retroviral therapy: its implication for primary care physician

Koh KC

Malays Fam Physician, 2010;5(2):77-82.
PMID: 25606192 MyJurnal

Careful drug history should be elicited from HIV infected patient on ART by the attending primary care physician in order to avoid potential adverse effects from drug-drug interactions. In conclusion, primary care physicians have a significant role in early diagnosis of HIV infected people, ensuring wider access to early ART, ensuring the welfare of health care workers attending to possible HIV positive patients and safe long term follow up of HIV positive patients needing medications for non-HIV related ailments.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Fulltext The child with suspected hearing loss

Philip R

Malays Fam Physician, 2013;8(2):65-66.
PMID: 25606288 MyJurnal

An 8-year-old girl was noticed by her parents to be less attentive and she would respond only after being called several times. She had just recovered from an upper respiratory tract infection two weeks before. The parents brought her to see a primary care physician. The patient had no other complaints, and the rest of the history was unremarkable. Physical examination was normal except for the otoscopic findings shown below (Figure 1) Tuning fork tests indicated conductive deafness.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care
Fulltext Rural doctors' views on and experiences with evidence-based medicine: The FrEEDoM qualitative study

Hisham R, Liew SM, Ng CJ, Mohd Nor K, Osman IF, Ho GJ, et al.

PLoS One, 2016;11(3):e0152649.
PMID: 27031700 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152649

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine is the integration of individual clinical expertise, best external evidence and patient values which was introduced more than two decades ago. Yet, primary care physicians in Malaysia face unique barriers in accessing scientific literature and applying it to their clinical practice.
AIM: This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of rural doctors' about evidence-based medicine in their daily clinical practice in a rural primary care setting.
METHODS: Qualitative methodology was used. The interviews were conducted in June 2013 in two rural health clinics in Malaysia. The participants were recruited using purposive sampling. Four focus group discussions with 15 medical officers and three individual in-depth interviews with family medicine specialists were carried out. All interviews were conducted using a topic guide and were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, checked and analyzed using a thematic approach.
RESULTS: Key themes identified were: (1) doctors viewed evidence-based medicine mainly as statistics, research and guidelines, (2) reactions to evidence-based medicine were largely negative, (3) doctors relied on specialists, peers, guidelines and non-evidence based internet sources for information, (4) information sources were accessed using novel methods such as mobile applications and (5) there are several barriers to evidence-based practice, including doctor-, evidence-based medicine-, patient- and system-related factors. These included inadequacies in knowledge, attitude, management support, time and access to evidence-based information sources. Participants recommended the use of online services to support evidence-based practice in the rural settings.
CONCLUSION: The level of evidence-based practice is low in the rural setting due to poor awareness, knowledge, attitude and resources. Doctors use non-evidence based sources and access them through new methods such as messaging applications. Further research is recommended to develop and evaluate interventions to overcome the identified barriers.
Study site: Klinik Kesihatan, Malaysia

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care/psychology*
Fulltext Development and validation of the Evidence Based Medicine Questionnaire (EBMQ) to assess doctors' knowledge, practice and barriers regarding the implementation of evidence-based medicine in primary care

Hisham R, Ng CJ, Liew SM, Lai PSM, Chia YC, Khoo EM, et al.

BMC Fam Pract, 2018 06 23;19(1):98.
PMID: 29935527 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0779-5

BACKGROUND: Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) integrates best available evidence from literature and patients' values, which then informs clinical decision making. However, there is a lack of validated instruments to assess the knowledge, practice and barriers of primary care physicians in the implementation of EBM. This study aimed to develop and validate an Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire (EBMQ) in Malaysia.
METHODS: The EBMQ was developed based on a qualitative study, literature review and an expert panel. Face and content validity was verified by the expert panel and piloted among 10 participants. Primary care physicians with or without EBM training who could understand English were recruited from December 2015 to January 2016. The EBMQ was administered at baseline and two weeks later. A higher score indicates better knowledge, better practice of EBM and less barriers towards the implementation of EBM. We hypothesized that the EBMQ would have three domains: knowledge, practice and barriers.
RESULTS: The final version of the EBMQ consists of 80 items: 62 items were measured on a nominal scale, 22 items were measured on a 5 point Likert-scale. Flesch reading ease was 61.2. A total of 343 participants were approached; of whom 320 agreed to participate (response rate = 93.2%). Factor analysis revealed that the EBMQ had eight domains after 13 items were removed: "EBM websites", "evidence-based journals", "types of studies", "terms related to EBM", "practice", "access", "patient preferences" and "support". Cronbach alpha for the overall EBMQ was 0.909, whilst the Cronbach alpha for the individual domain ranged from 0.657-0.940. The EBMQ was able to discriminate between doctors with and without EBM training for 24 out of 42 items. At test-retest, kappa values ranged from 0.155 to 0.620.
CONCLUSIONS: The EBMQ was found to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess the knowledge, practice and barriers towards the implementation of EBM among primary care physicians in Malaysia.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care*
Fulltext Parental and clinician agreement of illness severity in children with RTIs: secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study

van der Werf ET, Redmond NM, Turnbull S, Thornton H, Thompson M, Little P, et al.

Br J Gen Pract, 2019 Apr;69(681):e236-e245.
PMID: 30858333 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701837

BACKGROUND: Severity assessments of respiratory tract infection (RTI) in children are known to differ between parents and clinicians, but determinants of perceived severity are unknown.
AIM: To investigate the (dis)agreement between, and compare the determinants of, parent and clinician severity scores.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study of 8394 children presenting to primary care with acute (≤28 days) cough and RTI.
METHOD: Data on sociodemographic factors, parent-reported symptoms, clinician-reported findings, and severity assessments were used. Kappa (κ)-statistics were used to investigate (dis) agreement, whereas multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with illness severity.
RESULTS: Parents reported higher illness severity (mean 5.2 [standard deviation (SD) 1.8], median 5 [interquartile range (IQR) 4-7]), than clinicians (mean 3.1 [SD 1.7], median 3 [IQR 2-4], P<0.0001). There was low positive correlation between these scores (+0.43) and poor inter-rater agreement between parents and clinicians (κ 0.049). The number of clinical signs was highly correlated with clinician scores (+0.71). Parent-reported symptoms (in the previous 24 hours) that were independently associated with higher illness severity scores, in order of importance, were: severe fever, severe cough, rapid breathing, severe reduced eating, moderate-to-severe reduced fluid intake, severe disturbed sleep, and change in cry. Three of these symptoms (severe fever, rapid breathing, and change in cry) along with inter/subcostal recession, crackles/crepitations, nasal flaring, wheeze, and drowsiness/irritability were associated with higher clinician scores.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians and parents use different factors and make different judgements about the severity of children's RTI. Improved understanding of the factors that concern parents could improve parent-clinician communication and consultation outcomes.

Matched MeSH terms: Physicians, Primary Care*

Filters

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links