METHODS: This is part of the Asian Prostate Cancer (A-CaP), a prospective and multicenter study conducted in 12 Asian countries. The study cohort comprised patients newly diagnosed between January 2016 and December 2018. Patients were allocated to three categories according to the universal health coverage effective coverage index (Category 1 ≥ 80; Category 2, 70-79; and Category 3,
METHODS: Documents were searched in major databases and websites using words such as Malaysia and T&CM, and additional documents were secured using snowballing techniques. Data were classified and organized according to the World Health Organization health systems framework.
RESULTS: Malaysia has focused on managing the safety and quality of T&CM, and to that end it has been institutionalized by enacting specialized laws rather than by applying existing medical law directly. Malaysia was able to institutionalize T&CM by adopting a step-by-step approach that considered the appropriateness of administrative policies and measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Malaysia's experiences in implementing its T&CM policies will raise practical implications for countries struggling to integrate their existing T&CM into the NHS and utilize it for universal health coverage.
METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021 and surveillance data to identify 27 health-related SDG indicators. The indicators were classified into 7 thematic areas: (i) nutrition, (ii) maternal, child and reproductive health (MCH), (iii) infectious diseases, (iv) non-communicable diseases (NCDs), (v) environmental health, (vi) universal health coverage (UHC), and (vii) road injuries. We developed an attainment index ranging from 0 to 100 for each SDG indicator by referencing the SDG targets and projected their progress to 2030. We find an overall positive progress towards the health-related SDG targets in ASEAN from 1990 to 2030. At the aggregate level by 2030, 2 member countries, Singapore and Brunei, are projected to achieve their targets (attainment score ≥ 90). At a wider regional level, ASEAN is projected to make substantial progress in nutrition, MCH, and UHC, with a majority of countries projected to come close to or achieve their targets. However, progress is projected to be slower in the areas of reducing the incidence of infectious disease (i.e., HIV and AIDs, hepatitis B, TB, and neglected tropical diseases), NCD-related mortality and its risk factors (i.e., harmful alcohol use and smoking), environment-related mortality and its risk factors (i.e., unsafe water and poor hygiene, and air pollution), and road injuries. Substantial disparities are identified in the region, with Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia and Thailand generally performing better than elsewhere. A limitation of our study was its reliance on historical trends which may not fully capture future political, social, or technological changes.
CONCLUSIONS: As a regional bloc, ASEAN faces persistent challenges in achieving health-related SDG targets by 2030, with unequal progress between countries. Moreover, epidemiological transitions and worsening environmental threats further compound potential gains. At the country level, efforts to enhance health system financing, quality and equity will need to be coupled with wider approaches that address structural drivers of disease. Furthermore, coordinated regional efforts will be essential to effectively respond to emerging threats posed by pollution and environmental risks.
METHOD: In-depth interviews (IDIs) will be conducted with Malaysian healthcare providers and cancer survivors and findings will be analysed thematically. The insights will be used in a subsequent phase to co-design a guideline to maintain the delivery of quality cancer care in Malaysia via a three-round modified Delphi survey with a broad range of cancer stakeholders.
EXPECTED RESULTS: Findings derived from IDIs and existing literature will be included for rating across three rounds by the expert panel. Feedback provided will be refined until consensus on the best practises for cancer care continuity during crises is achieved.
CONCLUSION: The output of the present study is not only expected to ensure the continuity of delivery of high-quality cancer care in Malaysia during the ongoing pandemic but also to be adapted during unforeseen crises in the near future.
POLICY SUMMARY STATEMENT: Collaborative work between policy makers, public health physicians, members of the multidisciplinary oncology team as well as cancer survivors is vital in developing an evidenced- based contingency plan for maintaining access to cancer care.