Affiliations 

  • 1 Oxford Martin School and Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mohammad.farhadinia@biology.ox.ac.uk
  • 2 Cambridge Conservation Initiative, David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, UK
  • 3 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • 4 Eco Values for Sustainable Development, Lutfi Quder Street, 11610, Amman, Jordan
  • 5 Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 666303, Yunnan, China
  • 6 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Duzce University, Duzce, 81620, Turkey
  • 7 Wildlife Consultant, P.O Box 82, Sadah, 100, Oman
  • 8 Wildlife Conservation Society, Mongolia Program, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • 9 Institute of Zoology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • 10 Field Research Department, Prince Saud al Faisal Wildlife Research Centre, Taif, Saudi Arabia
  • 11 Department of Forestry & Wildlife Management, University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan
  • 12 Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of Forests and Environment, Government of Nepal, Singhadurbar, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • 13 Caucasus Nature Fund, Tbilisi, Georgia
  • 14 Vasundhara Sector 5, Ghaziabad, 201012, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 15 Independent Wildlife Researcher, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • 16 A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt, 33, Moscow, 119071, Russian Federation
  • 17 Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, University Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
Commun Biol, 2022 Nov 29;5(1):1221.
PMID: 36443482 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04061-w

Abstract

Aichi Target 11 committed governments to protect ≥17% of their terrestrial environments by 2020, yet it was rarely achieved, raising questions about the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework goal to protect 30% by 2030. Asia is a challenging continent for such targets, combining high biodiversity with dense human populations. Here, we evaluated achievements in Asia against Aichi Target 11. We found that Asia was the most underperforming continent globally, with just 13.2% of terrestrial protected area (PA) coverage, averaging 14.1 ± SE 1.8% per country in 2020. 73.1% of terrestrial ecoregions had <17% representation and only 7% of PAs even had an assessment of management effectiveness. We found that a higher agricultural land in 2015 was associated with lower PA coverage today. Asian countries also showed a remarkably slow average annual pace of 0.4 ± SE 0.1% increase of PA extent. These combined lines of evidence suggest that the ambitious 2030 targets are unlikely to be achieved in Asia unless the PA coverage to increase 2.4-5.9 times faster. We provided three recommendations to support Asian countries to meet their post-2020 biodiversity targets: complete reporting and the wider adoption "other effective area-based conservation measures"; restoring disturbed landscapes; and bolstering transboundary PAs.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.