Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2 Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 3 Division of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
  • 4 Department of International Clinical Development, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5 Department of Radiotherapy, Oncology and Palliative Care, Hospital Umum Sarawak (Sarawak General Hospital), Kuching, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of Pathology, Hospital Umum Sarawak (Sarawak General Hospital), Kuching, Malaysia
  • 7 Consultant Clinical Oncologist and Training Lead, Penang General Hospital, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • 8 Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia
  • 9 Cancer Institute, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
  • 10 Pathology Department, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 11 Division of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
Cancer Sci, 2023 Jun;114(6):2664-2673.
PMID: 36919757 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15790

Abstract

Tissue specimen quality assurance is a major issue of precision medicine for rare cancers. However, the laboratory standards and quality of pathological specimens prepared in Asian hospitals remain unknown. To understand the methods in Southeast Asian oncology hospitals and to clarify how pre-analytics affect the quality of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, a questionnaire surveying pre-analytical procedures (Part I) was administered, quality assessment of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and DNA/RNA extracted from the representative FFPE specimens from each hospital (Part II) was conducted, and the quality of DNA/RNA extracted from FFPE of rare-cancer patients for genomic sequencing (Part III) was examined. Quality measurements for DNA/RNA included ΔΔCt, DV200, and cDNA yield. Six major cancer hospitals from Malaysia, Philippines, and Vietnam participated. One hospital showed unacceptable quality for the DNA/RNA assessment, but improved by revising laboratory procedures. Only 57% (n = 73) of the 128 rare-cancer patients' specimens met both DNA and RNA quality criteria for next-generation sequencing. Median DV200 was 80.7% and 64.3% for qualified and failed RNA, respectively. Median ΔΔCt was 1.25 for qualified and 4.89 for failed DNA. Longer storage period was significantly associated with poor DNA (fail to qualify ratio = 1579:321 days, p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.