Affiliations 

  • 1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Social Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Manipal Hospitals, Port Klang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 4 Nuffield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • 5 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia. ida.hilmi@gmail.com
BMC Gastroenterol, 2023 May 25;23(1):185.
PMID: 37231353 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02817-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease is an uncommon disease in developing nations whereby patient's knowledge on the disease may be limited. The CCKNOW questionnaire, a widely known questionnaire to assess patient's knowledge on the disease, may be too complex to comprehend for patients in developing countries. The aim of this study is to develop a new tool known as AIBDKQ questionnaire to evaluate the local inflammatory bowel disease patient's knowledge.

METHODS: This was a prospective study carried out in four phases. In phase 1, three gastroenterologists with expertise in IBD generated a total of 21 questions related to the general knowledge of the disease in the English language. Phase 2 involved content and face validity whereby the questions were further validated by other gastroenterologists. In phase 3, the validated questions were translated into three languages namely Malay, Mandarin and Tamil which are commonly used in Malaysia. In phase 4 (statistical validity), administration of the questionnaires to patients and hospital staff were conducted to assess the construct validity, discriminative ability, predictive validity and reliability of the questionnaires.

RESULTS: A total of 21 questions were generated initially. Further evaluation indicated that 20 items had adequate kappa and content validity index for relevance (CVI: 0.714 to 1, Kapp: 0.645 to 1) and clarity (CVI: 0.714 to 1, Kapp: 0.645 to 1). The questionnaires in four languages were administered to 213 patients to assess the construct validity. Six items were removed (three for low communality, one for small loading factors, two for cross loading), resulting in 16 final questions. Assessment with 34 hospital staff involving nurses, doctors and clerks showed significant differences in knowledge between the groups (F = 14.007, p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications