Affiliations 

  • 1 USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT, USA. Electronic address: michael.k.schwartz@usda.gov
  • 2 USDA Forest Service, Policy Office, Strategy and Analysis Branch, Washington, DC, USA
  • 3 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • 4 USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT, USA
  • 5 Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • 6 Te Tira Whakamātaki and Biological Heritage National Science Challenge, New Zealand
  • 7 Panthera, New York, NY, USA
  • 8 Archipelago Consulting, Portland, ME, USA
  • 9 Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
  • 10 The Ethics Institute and Department of Philosophy and Religion, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
  • 11 Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
  • 12 Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
  • 13 Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA; Division of Biological Sciences and Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA; Institute for Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
Trends Ecol Evol, 2024 Dec 11.
PMID: 39667987 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.11.011

Abstract

Introducing new genes and new species into ecosystems where they have not previously existed presents opportunities and complex, multivalue decisions for conservation biologists and the public. Both synthetic biology and conservation introductions offer potential benefits, such as avoiding extinctions and restoring ecological function, but also carry risks of unintended ecological consequences and raise social and moral concerns. Although the conservation community has attempted to establish guidelines for each new tool, there is a need for comprehensive principles that will enable conservation managers to navigate emerging technologies. Here, we combine biological, legal, social, cultural, and ethical considerations into an inclusive set of principles designed to facilitate the efforts of managers facing high-consequence conservation decisions by clarifying the stakes of inaction and action, along with the use of decision frameworks to integrate multiple considerations.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.