Affiliations 

  • 1 Sum Yin Chong , BDS (Mal), Klinik Pergigian Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
  • 2 Tai Boon Lim, BDS (Mal), Klinik Pergigian Peringgit, Melaka, Malaysia
  • 3 Liang Lin Seow, BDS (Mal), MSc (London), FDSRCS (Eng), PhD (Mal), School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Malaysian Dental Journal, 2008;29(2):97-103.
MyJurnal

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to assess: i) the staining susceptibility of composite resins, ii) the ability of whitening toothpastes in removing stains from composite resins.
Materials and Methods: Thirty specimens from each composite resins: Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE), Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) and Beautifil (Shofu Inc.) were fabricated. After polishing, specimens were immersed in coffee for 3 days. Specimens were then brushed twice a day for 2 weeks using Colgate Total (Colgate-Palmolive, control group), Colgate Advanced Whitening (Colgate- Palmolive, test group) and Darlie All Shiny White (Hawley & Hazel Chemical Co., test group). Colour changes (?E*) were measured using Spectrophotometer at baseline, after coffee immersion and after brushing. Results were statistically analyzed using one way ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Results: There was significant difference in terms of colour changes for Filtek Z350, Filtek Z250 and Beautifil after coffee immersion (P0.05).
Conclusions: Filtek Z350 was able to resist staining by coffee better than Filtek Z250 and Beautifil. The whitening toothpastes did not offer added advantage in terms of ability to remove stains compared to ordinary toothpaste.