Affiliations 

  • 1 Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, 11800,, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia. yusrahabib@ymail.com
  • 2 Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, 11800,, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia
  • 3 Chronic Kidney Disease Resource Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, University Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerain, Kelantan, Malaysia
Clin Exp Nephrol, 2017 Dec;21(6):1011-1023.
PMID: 28271257 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-017-1397-6

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diuretic therapy has been the mainstay of treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, primarily for hypertension and fluid overload. Apart from their beneficial effects, diuretic use is associated with adverse renal outcomes. The current study is aimed to determine the outcomes of diuretic therapy.
METHODOLOGY: A prospective observational study was conducted by inviting pre-dialysis CKD patients. Fluid overload was assessed by Bioimpedance analysis (BIA).
RESULTS: A total 312 patients (mean age 64.5 ± 6.43) were enrolled. Among 144 (46.1%) diuretic users, furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were prescribed in 69 (48%) and 39 (27%) patients, respectively, while 36 (25%) were prescribed with combination therapy (furosemide plus HCTZ). Changes in BP, fluid compartments, eGFR decline and progression to RRT were assessed over a follow-up period of 1 year. Maximum BP control was observed with combination therapy (-19.3 mmHg, p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.