Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan. alisonwks@xtbg.ac.cn
  • 2 The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. gen33takayama@gmail.com
  • 3 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. rehsaj@gmail.com
  • 4 Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan. asakawa@faculty.chiba-u.jp
  • 5 Biotechnology Programme, M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India. justforscience@gmail.com
  • 6 Forestry Sciences Department, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia. onrizal@gmail.com
  • 7 Bali Botanical Garden, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bali, Indonesia. biobayu@gmail.com
  • 8 Faculty of Biology, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia. eriantoo@yahoo.com
  • 9 Forest Biology Department, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. sungkaes@tcd.ie
  • 10 Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Kota Kinabalu, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. lyenda85@gmail.com
  • 11 Mangrove Ecosystem Research Centre, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Vietnam. xt_xuthanh@yahoo.com
  • 12 Department of Environmental Science, School of Science and Engineering, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines. ssalmo@ateneo.edu
  • 13 Biology Department, College of Science and Technology, Adventist University of the Philippines, Silang, 4118, Cavite, Philippines. obyupd@yahoo.com
  • 14 Department of Forest Production, Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. mnazre@gmail.com
  • 15 Department of Botany, University of Yangon, Yangon, Myanmar. khinkhinsoe9@googlemail.com
  • 16 Faculty of Education, University of the Ryukyus, Senbaru, Okinawa, Japan. mame@edu.u-ryukyu.ac.jp
  • 17 Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan. watano@faculty.chiba-u.jp
  • 18 Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Iriomote, Okinawa, Japan. babasan@lab.u-ryukyu.ac.jp
  • 19 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. ted.webb@nus.edu.sg
  • 20 Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan. tkaji@faculty.chiba-u.jp
BMC Evol. Biol., 2015 Mar 29;15:57.
PMID: 25888261 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0331-3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mangrove forests are ecologically important but globally threatened intertidal plant communities. Effective mangrove conservation requires the determination of species identity, management units, and genetic structure. Here, we investigate the genetic distinctiveness and genetic structure of an iconic but yet taxonomically confusing species complex Rhizophora mucronata and R. stylosa across their distributional range, by employing a suite of 20 informative nuclear SSR markers.

RESULTS: Our results demonstrated the general genetic distinctiveness of R. mucronata and R. stylosa, and potential hybridization or introgression between them. We investigated the population genetics of each species without the putative hybrids, and found strong genetic structure between oceanic regions in both R. mucronata and R. stylosa. In R. mucronata, a strong divergence was detected between populations from the Indian Ocean region (Indian Ocean and Andaman Sea) and the Pacific Ocean region (Malacca Strait, South China Sea and Northwest Pacific Ocean). In R. stylosa, the genetic break was located more eastward, between populations from South and East China Sea and populations from the Southwest Pacific Ocean. The location of these genetic breaks coincided with the boundaries of oceanic currents, thus suggesting that oceanic circulation patterns might have acted as a cryptic barrier to gene flow.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have important implications on the conservation of mangroves, especially relating to replanting efforts and the definition of evolutionary significant units in Rhizophora species. We outlined the genetic structure and identified geographical areas that require further investigations for both R. mucronata and R. stylosa. These results serve as the foundation for the conservation genetics of R. mucronata and R. stylosa and highlighted the need to recognize the genetic distinctiveness of closely-related species, determine their respective genetic structure, and avoid artificially promoting hybridization in mangrove restoration programmes.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.