Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Endocrinology, Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark elisabeth.reinhardt.mathiesen@regionh.dk
  • 2 Masjid Tanah Health Clinic, Malacca, Malaysia
  • 3 Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
  • 4 Department of Endocrinology-Diabetes Center, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • 5 Department of Internal Medicine and Diabetology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
  • 6 Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • 7 Department of Endocrinology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 8 College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • 9 Endo-Diabesidad Clínica Durán & Asociados, Seville, Spain
  • 10 Department of Diabetology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
  • 11 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State Referral Center for Diabetes in Pregnancy, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 12 Centre for Diabetes and Nutrition Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
  • 13 Metabolic Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, U.K
  • 14 Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Diabetes Care, 2021 09;44(9):2069-2077.
PMID: 34330786 DOI: 10.2337/dc21-0472

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of severe adverse pregnancy complications in women with preexisting diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Multinational, prospective cohort study to assess the prevalence of newborns free from major congenital malformations or perinatal or neonatal death (primary end point) following treatment with insulin detemir (detemir) versus other basal insulins.

RESULTS: Of 1,457 women included, 727 received detemir and 730 received other basal insulins. The prevalence of newborns free from major congenital malformations or perinatal or neonatal death was similar between detemir (97.0%) and other basal insulins (95.5%) (crude risk difference 0.015 [95% CI -0.01, 0.04]; adjusted risk difference -0.003 [95% CI -0.03, 0.03]). The crude prevalence of one or more congenital malformations (major plus minor) was 9.4% vs. 12.6%, with a similar risk difference before (-0.032 [95% CI -0.064, 0.000]) and after (-0.036 [95% CI -0.081, 0.009]) adjustment for confounders. Crude data showed lower maternal HbA1c during the first trimester (6.5% vs. 6.7% [48 vs. 50 mmol/mol]; estimated mean difference -0.181 [95% CI -0.300, -0.062]) and the second trimester (6.1% vs. 6.3% [43 vs. 45 mmol/mol]; -0.139 [95% CI -0.232, -0.046]) and a lower prevalence of major hypoglycemia (6.0% vs. 9.0%; risk difference -0.030 [95% CI -0.058, -0.002]), preeclampsia (6.4% vs. 10.0%; -0.036 [95% CI -0.064, -0.007]), and stillbirth (0.4% vs. 1.8%; -0.013 [95% CI -0.024, -0.002]) with detemir compared with other basal insulins. However, differences were not significant postadjustment.

CONCLUSIONS: Insulin detemir was associated with a similar risk to other basal insulins of major congenital malformations, perinatal or neonatal death, hypoglycemia, preeclampsia, and stillbirth.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.