METHODS: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2018 and November 2020. This study included diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with no DR, non-proliferative DR (NPDR), and proliferative DR (PDR). None of the patients with DM were included in the control group. Unstimulated saliva samples were then collected. TNF-α and IL-6 levels were measured.
RESULTS: Altogether, 120 patients were included in the study (DM without DR, 33 patients; DM with NPDR, 30 patients; DM with PDR, 32 patients; non-DM, 25 patients). The mean IL-6 level in saliva was significantly higher in the DM group (0.033 ± 0.005 pg/ml) than in the non-DM group (0.027 ± 0.001 pg/ml) (p
METHODS: Cross-sectional study involving a retrospective record review of diabetic macular oedema patients who received an induction treatment of three monthly 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab injections between 2016 and 2019. Central macular thickness was measured at baseline and 3 months post-treatment. Linear regression was applied to identify the factors associated with the changes of central macular thickness.
RESULTS: A total of 153 diabetic macular oedema patients were involved in this study. Their mean age was 57.5 ± 7.7 years, 54.9% were female. The mean change of central macular thickness from baseline to 3 months after completed induction treatment of intravitreal ranibizumab was 155.5 ± 137.8 μm. Factors significantly associated with changes of central macular thickness were baseline central macular thickness [b = 0.73; 95% (CI): 0.63, 0.84; p = <0.001] and presence of subretinal fluid [b = 35.43; 95% CI: 3.70, 67.16; p = 0.029].
CONCLUSION: Thicker baseline central macular thickness and presence of subretinal fluid were the factors significantly associated with greater changes of central macular thickness in diabetic macular oedema patients after receiving three injections of intravitreal ranibizumab.
METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2016 and May 2018 involving type 2 DM patients with no DR, non-proliferative DR (NPDR), and proliferative DR (PDR). Tear samples were collected using no.41 Whatman filter paper (Schirmer strips) and 5 mL blood samples were drawn by venous puncture. VEGF levels in tears and serum were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: A total of 88 type 2 DM patients (no DR: 30 patients, NPDR: 28 patients, PDR: 30 patients) were included in the study. Mean tear VEGF levels were significantly higher in the NPDR and PDR groups (114.4 SD 52.5 pg/mL and 150.8 SD 49.7 pg/mL, respectively) compared to the no DR group (40.4 SD 26.5 pg/mL, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean serum VEGF levels between the three groups. There was a fair correlation between serum and tear VEGF levels (p = 0.015, r = 0.263).
CONCLUSION: VEGF levels in tears were significantly higher amongst diabetic patients with DR compared to those without DR and were significantly associated with the severity of DR. There was a fair correlation between serum and tear VEGF levels. Detection of VEGF in tears is a good non-invasive predictor test for the severity of DR. A large cohort study is needed for further evaluation.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan from November 2013 till May 2016 among Type 2 DM patients (DM with no DR and DM with NPDR). The patients were evaluated for anterior ocular segment biometry [central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber width (ACW), angle opening distance (AOD) and anterior chamber angle (ACA)] by using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT). Three ml venous blood was taken for the measurement of HbA1c.
RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included in this study (DM with no DR: 50 patients, DM with NPDR: 50 patients, non DM: 50 patients as a control group). The mean CCT and ACW showed significant difference among the three groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015 respectively). Based on post hoc result, there were significant mean difference of CCT between non DM and DM with NPDR (mean difference 36.14 μm, p < 0.001) and also between non DM and DM with no DR (mean difference 31.48 μm, p = 0.003). The ACW was significantly narrower in DM with NPDR (11.39 mm SD 0.62) compared to DM with no DR (11.76 mm SD 0.53) (p = 0.012). There were no significant correlation between HbA1c and all the anterior ocular segment biometry.
CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients have significantly thicker CCT regardless of retinopathy status whereas ACW was significantly narrower in DM with NPDR group compared to DM with no DR. There was no significant correlations between HbA1c and all anterior ocular segment biometry in diabetic patients regardless of DR status.
Methods: This was a prospective cohort study involving newly diagnosed PDR patients. All patients underwent specular microscopy examination (CCT, ECD and endothelial cell area CoV) both pre-PRP and at 1-week and 6-weeks after the final PRP session (post-PRP). A Carl Zeiss Visulas Argon laser (532 nm) was used to perform PRP.
Results: A total of 33 newly diagnosed PDR patients were included in this study. There were no significant differences in mean CCT, ECD, and endothelial cell area CoV at 1-week and 6-weeks following PRP compared to pre-treatment baseline (p > 0.05). Further, there were no significant correlations between laser energy delivered and CCT, ECD and endothelial cell area CoV at either post-PRP examination time.
Conclusion: Argon laser (523 nm) energy delivered within recommended ranges for PRP had no adverse effects on corneal structure.
Methods: This was a prospective cohort study and was conducted from June 2017 to May 2019. Patients with underlying NPDR who were planned for phacoemulsification were recruited in this study. Non-diabetic patients who were planned for phacoemulsification were included as control group. Tears samples were collected using Schirmer strip two weeks prior to operation, at day (D) 7 and D30 post phacoemulsification. Tears samples were analyzed for VEGF level.
Results: A total of 65 patients were recruited in this study (NPDR: 32 and control: 33). There was significant increase of VEGF levels in tears from pre operation to D7 post phacoemulsification in NPDR (p
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among type 2 DM patients. The patients were divided into three groups: no DR, non-proliferative DR (NPDR) and proliferative DR (PDR). Tears samples were collected using Schirmer strips for measurement of catalase, GPx and MDA.
RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were recruited in this study (no DR, 58 patients; NPDR, 57 patients; PDR, 56 patients). There was significant difference in the mean level of GPx in tears between the three groups (no DR, 658.08 ± 115.70 U/L; NPDR, 653.78 ± 87.90 U/L; PDR, 605.31 ± 107.47 U/L, respectively) before and after adjustment for covariates (p = 0.013 and p = 0.001, respectively). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed PDR group had significantly lower mean GPx level than in no DR (p=0.001) and NPDR (p=0.037) after adjustment for covariates. There was no significant difference of mean catalase and MDA in the tears between the three groups before and after adjustment for covariates.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that diabetic patient with DR is associated with low level of GPx in tears, suggesting that this antioxidant enzyme is a potential biomarker for predicting the presence of DR.