METHODS: A literature review was conducted using the keyword of "Odontogenic carcinosarcoma" and all relevant articles were screened. The data collected include demographic profile (age, gender), clinical information (symptoms, location, size), radiologic features, histopathological examination, management, recurrence, metastases, and survival status.
RESULTS: A total of 17 OCS cases including a new case from our hospital. The incidence of OCS was highest in the third decades of life with predilection for male and posterior region of mandible. Clinically, patients may present with swelling and neurological symptoms. Radiographic examination often showed radiolucency with ill-defined border. This tumour demonstrates an aggressive behaviour with reported cases of distant metastases to the lung, lymph nodes, rib, and pelvis. Here, we report an interesting case of OCS in a 38-year-old man with a previous diagnosis of ameloblastoma. The patient was diagnosed with ameloblastoma but refused surgical intervention and returned after 10 years with rapidly enlarging mass on the right side of mandible. Microscopically, the lesion appears as biphasic odontogenic tumour with malignant cytological features seen in both epithelium and mesenchymal components. The spindle to round mesenchymal tumour cells were only positive for vimentin. Ki67 proliferation index was high in both epithelium and mesenchymal components.
CONCLUSION: This case showed the tendency of untreated ameloblastoma to undergo malignant changes in the long term.
CASE REPORT: The deceased was brought-in-dead to the hospital from their workplace, with no signs of fatal natural diseases. External examination revealed a Y-shaped burn mark on the right side of the neck and collapsed blisters with greying rings on both heels. Internal examination showed no alarming findings. Further, histopathological analysis of the foot blisters and neck burn revealed intraepidermal detachment, elongated nuclei, and coagulative necrosis. Notably, the presence of muscle fibre casts in kidney tubules and microthrombi in lung sections which indicate rhabdomyolysis and vascular thrombosis supported electrocution-related death.
CONCLUSION: These positive findings of the electrical burn marks externally and significant histopathological changes, collectively support the death was due to electrocution, after excluding any major, fatal injuries. Albeit, a detailed inspection of the crime scene plays an important role, in order to classify the electrocution related death.