METHODS: Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Gene Expression Omnibus database were analyzed to assess ETBR expression. For survival analysis, glioblastoma samples from 25 Swedish patients were immunostained for ETBR, and the findings were correlated with clinical history. The druggability of ETBR was assessed by protein-protein interaction network analysis. ERAs were analyzed for toxicity in in vitro assays with GBM and breast cancer cells.
RESULTS: By bioinformatics analysis, ETBR was found to be upregulated in glioblastoma patients, and its expression levels were correlated with reduced survival. ETBR interacts with key proteins involved in cancer pathogenesis, suggesting it as a druggable target. In vitro viability assays showed that ERAs may hold promise to treat glioblastoma and breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: ETBR is overexpressed in glioblastoma and other cancers and may be a prognostic marker in glioblastoma. ERAs may be useful for treating cancer patients.
Case Description: We report a 42-year-old man, diagnosed with rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor of the fourth ventricle with a positive isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation, progressed to glioblastoma after 6 years from diagnosis. We discuss the clinical history, radiological findings, and histopathological characteristic with immunohistochemistry findings observed in this unique case.
Conclusions: Despite being acceptable as benign, based on our observations in this case, there is a potential for malignant transformation of rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor. The role of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation leading to malignant transformation could not be established as our finding is novel and further prospective studies are required to prove this association.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of nerve biopsy reports from April 1998 to June 2021 of patients with peripheral neuropathies presenting to the Department of Pathology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The diagnostic value of the biopsies was determined based on the criteria by Midroni and Bilbao as follows: contributive (essential and helpful), non-contributive and inadequate.
RESULTS: A total of 107 nerve biopsies were analysed. Sixty-four (60 %) were males and the mean age was 52 years, ranging from 13 to 86 years. Ninety-four (88 %) were sural nerve biopsies; and only one patient (1 %) each had superficial peroneal and superficial radial nerve biopsy. The indications for the procedure were vasculitis (34 %), peripheral neuropathy of unknown aetiology (34 %), amyloidosis (14 %) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (10 %). In 68 (63 %) biopsies, the diagnostic value was contributive. Of these, 28 (26 %) were essential and 40 (37 %) were helpful. In contrast, 35 (33 %) biopsies were non-contributive and 4 (4 %) were inadequate. In 66 % (71/107) of cases, the nerve biopsy did not reveal a definite pathological diagnosis. However, in the remainder, a diagnosis of vasculitis (18 %, 19/107), followed by amyloidosis (10 %, 11/107) could be determined. For 32/71 biopsies with undetermined pathological diagnosis, neuropathy remained cryptogenic in 22 % (7/32) upon follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of vasculitis and amyloidosis, there is limited value in performing nerve biopsies in the evaluation of patients with peripheral neuropathy. However, this should be interpreted with caution as the number of patients with a clinical diagnosis of vasculitis and amyloidosis were relatively larger than patients with other diagnosis. Refinement and careful selection of cases are required to increase the diagnostic yield of nerve biopsy.
MAIN METHODS: A pull-down assay was performed to identify the binding partner of the L-SP40 peptide. Co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization assays with the L-SP40 peptide were employed to confirm the receptor partner in RD cells. The outcomes were validated using receptor knockdown and antibody blocking assays. The L-SP40 peptide was further evaluated for the protection of neonatal mice against lethal challenge by mouse-adapted EV-A71.
KEY FINDINGS: The L-SP40 peptide was found to interact and co-localize with nucleolin, the key attachment receptor of Enteroviruses A species, as demonstrated in the pull-down, co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization assays. Knockdown of nucleolin from RD cells led to a significant reduction of 3.5 logs of viral titer of EV-A71. The L-SP40 peptide demonstrated 80% protection of neonatal mice against lethal challenge by the mouse-adapted virus with a drastic reduction in the viral loads in the blood (~4.5 logs), skeletal muscles (1.5 logs) and brain stem (1.5 logs).
SIGNIFICANCE: L-SP40 peptide prevented severe hind limb paralysis and death in suckling mice and could serve as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral candidate to be further evaluated for safety and potency in future clinical trials against EV-A71.