DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We used PCR to determine the size of CTG repeats in 377 individuals not known to be affected by DM and 11 DM1 suspected patients, recruited from a tertiary hospital in Kuala Lumpur. TP-PCR was performed on selected samples, followed by Southern blot hybridisation of PCR amplified fragments to confirm and estimate the size of CTG expansion.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of individuals not known to be affected by DM with (CTG)>18 was determined according to ethnic group and as a whole population. The χ2 test was performed to compare the distribution of (CTG)>18 with 12 other populations. Additionally, the accuracy of TP-PCR in detecting CTG expansion in 11 patients with DM1 was determined by comparing the results with that from Southern blot hybridisation.
RESULTS: Of the 754 chromosomes studied, (CTG)>18 frequency of 3.60%, 1.57% and 4.00% in the Malay, Chinese and Indian subpopulations, respectively, was detected, showing similarities to data from Thai, Taiwanese and Kuwaiti populations. We also successfully detected CTG expansions in 9 patients using the TP-PCR method followed by the estimation of CTG expansion size via Southern blot hybridisation.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show a low DM1 prevalence in Malaysia with the possibility of underdiagnosis and demonstrates the feasibility of using a clinical and TP-PCR-based approach for rapid and cost-effective DM1 diagnosis in developing countries.
METHODS: We evaluated the expression patterns of 11 candidate miRNAs using quantitative real-time PCR in whole blood (n = 10) and muscle biopsy samples (n = 9) of DM1 patients, and compared them to those of normal control samples (whole blood, n = 10; muscle, n = 9).
RESULTS: In DM1 whole blood, miRNA-133a, -29b, and -33a were significantly upregulated, whereas miRNA-1, -133a, and -29c were significantly downregulated in the skeletal muscles compared to controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings align to those reported in other studies and point towards pathways that potentially contribute toward pathogenesis in DM1. However, the currently available data is not sufficient for these miRNAs to be made DM1-specific biomarkers because they seem to be common to many muscle pathologies. Hence, they lack specificity, but reinforce the need for further exploration of DM1 biomarkers.
MAIN METHODS: A pull-down assay was performed to identify the binding partner of the L-SP40 peptide. Co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization assays with the L-SP40 peptide were employed to confirm the receptor partner in RD cells. The outcomes were validated using receptor knockdown and antibody blocking assays. The L-SP40 peptide was further evaluated for the protection of neonatal mice against lethal challenge by mouse-adapted EV-A71.
KEY FINDINGS: The L-SP40 peptide was found to interact and co-localize with nucleolin, the key attachment receptor of Enteroviruses A species, as demonstrated in the pull-down, co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization assays. Knockdown of nucleolin from RD cells led to a significant reduction of 3.5 logs of viral titer of EV-A71. The L-SP40 peptide demonstrated 80% protection of neonatal mice against lethal challenge by the mouse-adapted virus with a drastic reduction in the viral loads in the blood (~4.5 logs), skeletal muscles (1.5 logs) and brain stem (1.5 logs).
SIGNIFICANCE: L-SP40 peptide prevented severe hind limb paralysis and death in suckling mice and could serve as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral candidate to be further evaluated for safety and potency in future clinical trials against EV-A71.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of nerve biopsy reports from April 1998 to June 2021 of patients with peripheral neuropathies presenting to the Department of Pathology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The diagnostic value of the biopsies was determined based on the criteria by Midroni and Bilbao as follows: contributive (essential and helpful), non-contributive and inadequate.
RESULTS: A total of 107 nerve biopsies were analysed. Sixty-four (60 %) were males and the mean age was 52 years, ranging from 13 to 86 years. Ninety-four (88 %) were sural nerve biopsies; and only one patient (1 %) each had superficial peroneal and superficial radial nerve biopsy. The indications for the procedure were vasculitis (34 %), peripheral neuropathy of unknown aetiology (34 %), amyloidosis (14 %) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (10 %). In 68 (63 %) biopsies, the diagnostic value was contributive. Of these, 28 (26 %) were essential and 40 (37 %) were helpful. In contrast, 35 (33 %) biopsies were non-contributive and 4 (4 %) were inadequate. In 66 % (71/107) of cases, the nerve biopsy did not reveal a definite pathological diagnosis. However, in the remainder, a diagnosis of vasculitis (18 %, 19/107), followed by amyloidosis (10 %, 11/107) could be determined. For 32/71 biopsies with undetermined pathological diagnosis, neuropathy remained cryptogenic in 22 % (7/32) upon follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of vasculitis and amyloidosis, there is limited value in performing nerve biopsies in the evaluation of patients with peripheral neuropathy. However, this should be interpreted with caution as the number of patients with a clinical diagnosis of vasculitis and amyloidosis were relatively larger than patients with other diagnosis. Refinement and careful selection of cases are required to increase the diagnostic yield of nerve biopsy.