METHODS: An exploratory review of past literatures on the usage of ultrasound technique in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult patients, and the role of other imaging techniques were undertaken for the study.
RESULTS: The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis still remains a histopathological confirmation after appendectomy. The study further shows imaging has high diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with low rate of negative appendectomy (<10%). Multiple reasons are identified, including the introduction of computed tomography imaging especially in those patients where ultrasound was unequivocal, more education on imaging which leads to better operator skill or improved performances of machines.
CONCLUSION: Imaging undoubtedly plays an important role in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with ultrasound remaining the first-line method in patients referred with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. Nevertheless, those with borderline ultrasound findings or unable to visualize appendix on ultrasound with highly suspicious sign and symptoms were offered other imaging modalities such as CT scan.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the managing team balance the risk of radiation exposure, risk of delay in urgent operation and risk of perforation prior to a decision.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients-21 exertional angina; 17 unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI); 26 ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-provided 188 diseased segments on conventional angiography. All underwent MDCTA within a week of angiography. ROI was mapped out from maximum intensity projections of diseased segments in planar view.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four segments were evaluated. Patients who presented with ACS (STEMI and unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction) had lower mean VDR compared to patients with exertional angina (0.58 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.81; P < 0.001). Culprit lesions in ACS patients also had the lowest mean VDR when compared to nonculprit lesions and lesions in patients without ACS (0.51 vs. 0.68 vs. 0.81; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: VDR is a new, convenient, and standardized approach in identifying "culprit" lesions by MDCTA.