DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Psychological Information Database (PsycINFO) from inception till December 2019.
STUDY SELECTION: All randomised control trials comparing CoQ10 with placebo or used as an adjunct treatment included in this meta-analysis. Cross-over designs and controlled clinical trials were excluded.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Heterogeneity at face value by comparing populations, settings, interventions and outcomes were measured and statistical heterogeneity was assessed by means of the I2 statistic. The treatment effect for dichotomous outcomes were using risk ratios and risk difference, and for continuous outcomes, mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean difference; both with 95% CIs were used. Subgroup analyses were carried out for dosage of CoQ10 and if CoQ10 combined with another supplementation. Sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the impact risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment of included studies.
RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 371 participants were included in the meta-analysis. There is no statistically significant reduction in severity of migraine headache with CoQ10 supplementation. CoQ10 supplementation reduced the duration of headache attacks compared with the control group (MD: -0.19; 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.11; random effects; I2 statistic=0%; p<0.00001). CoQ10 usage reduced the frequency of migraine headache compared with the control group (MD: -1.52; 95% CI: -2.40 to -0.65; random effects; I2 statistic=0%; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: CoQ10 appears to have beneficial effects in reducing duration and frequency of migraine attack.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019126127.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effects of fish oil supplementation on cognitive function in elderly person with MCI.
METHODS: This was a 12-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using fish oil supplementation with concentrated docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Thirty six low-socioeconomic-status elderly subjects with MCI were randomly assigned to receive either concentrated DHA fish oil (n = 18) or placebo (n = 18) capsules. The changes of memory, psychomotor speed, executive function and attention, and visual-constructive skills were assessed using cognitive tests. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability of the DHA concentrate.
RESULTS: The fish oil group showed significant improvement in short-term and working memory (F = 9.890; ηp (2) = 0.254; p
METHODS: Thirty-two adult cadaveric legs were disarticulated at the knee and unpaired. STA was performed on each specimen. The anatomy and distribution of the sural nerve and its branches were identified in relation to the incision. Three surgical windows were identified and selected. Kirshner wires were inserted in pairs via each of the windows towards the center of the sustentaculum tali. The safe angle for wire insertion in relation to the SN or its branches was then measured as well as the appropriate intraoperative drilling angle.
RESULTS: The plantar branch presented in the distal window in none of the samples, while the dorsal branches presented in 37.5% and the main SN presented in only 6.25%. In the middle window, the dorsal branch presented most often (43.75%) followed by the plantar branch (25.00%) and the SN (21.88%). In the proximal window, the SN presented in 100% of the samples, while the dorsal branch presented in none and the plantar branch presented in about 15.63% of the specimens. All three windows had their own acceptable average angle for screw insertion towards the sustentaculum tali.
CONCLUSIONS: The distal window is the safest for surgical approach and for calcaneal surgery screw fixation in terms of avoiding sural nerve injury. In addition, that window provides a wide working angle for screw fixation.
METHODS: A modified Students Motivation towards Science Learning (SMTSL) was used to assess the digital learning usage and learning motivation among 150 UKM and 147 SUMS medical students throughout Year 1 to 5.
RESULTS: The frequency of digital learning usage and learning motivation among UKM medical students was significantly higher as compared to SUMS (p