Affiliations 

  • 1 MUSE - Science Museum, Research & Collections Department, Conservation Biology Unit, Trento, Italy
  • 2 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, National Museum of Natural Sciences (MNCN), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
  • 3 Dept. of Nature Engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran
  • 4 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey
  • 5 Dept. of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
  • 6 Dept. of Geography, Barasat Government College, Barasat, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • 7 Wildlife and Conservation Biology Research Lab, Dept. of Life Sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan, Gujarat, India
  • 8 Panthera, New York, New York, United States of America
  • 9 Dept. of Human Ecology, Cinvestav, Merida Unit, Mérida, Mexico
  • 10 Tanzanian Wildlife Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania
  • 11 Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas IVIC, Caracas, Venezuela
  • 12 Dept. of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
  • 13 Daursky State Nature Biosphere Reserve, Zabaikalsky Krai, Onosky District, Nizhniy Tsasuchey, Russia
  • 14 Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India
  • 15 United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, United States of America
  • 16 NTNC - Biodiversity Conservation Center, Sauraha, Nepal
  • 17 Dept. of Environmental Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran
  • 18 Universidad Autónoma Del Estado De México Toluca, México y Universidad Autónoma Metropólitana-Lerma, Lerma de Villada, México
  • 19 Wildlife Research and Training Institute, Naivasha, Kenya
  • 20 Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity FEB RAS, Vladivostoka, Vladivostok, Russia
  • 21 Dept. of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
  • 22 Dept. Of Biological Sciences, Sunway University, n.5 Jalan University, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 23 Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Pacific Geographical Institute FEB RAS, Vladivostok, Russia
  • 24 Wildlife SOS - USA/India, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
  • 25 Aranya Foundation, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • 26 Dept. of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
  • 27 National Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal
  • 28 Forest Ecology Laboratory, Dept. of Forest Science, Faculty of Regional Environmental Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan
  • 29 Biodiversity Research Institute (IMIB; CSIC-Oviedo University, Principality of Asturias), Campus Mieres, Mieres (Asturias), Spain
PLoS Biol, 2023 Jan;21(1):e3001946.
PMID: 36719873 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001946

Abstract

Large carnivores have long fascinated human societies and have profound influences on ecosystems. However, their conservation represents one of the greatest challenges of our time, particularly where attacks on humans occur. Where human recreational and/or livelihood activities overlap with large carnivore ranges, conflicts can become particularly serious. Two different scenarios are responsible for such overlap: In some regions of the world, increasing human populations lead to extended encroachment into large carnivore ranges, which are subject to increasing contraction, fragmentation, and degradation. In other regions, human and large carnivore populations are expanding, thus exacerbating conflicts, especially in those areas where these species were extirpated and are now returning. We thus face the problem of learning how to live with species that can pose serious threats to humans. We collected a total of 5,440 large carnivore (Felidae, Canidae, and Ursidae; 12 species) attacks worldwide between 1950 and 2019. The number of reported attacks increased over time, especially in lower-income countries. Most attacks (68%) resulted in human injuries, whereas 32% were fatal. Although attack scenarios varied greatly within and among species, as well as in different areas of the world, factors triggering large carnivore attacks on humans largely depend on the socioeconomic context, with people being at risk mainly during recreational activities in high-income countries and during livelihood activities in low-income countries. The specific combination of local socioeconomic and ecological factors is thus a risky mix triggering large carnivore attacks on humans, whose circumstances and frequencies cannot only be ascribed to the animal species. This also implies that effective measures to reduce large carnivore attacks must also consider the diverse local ecological and social contexts.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.