Affiliations 

  • 1 Freshwater Biology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 2 Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 3 Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
  • 4 Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
  • 5 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agricultura e Ambiente, Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais e Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil
  • 6 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • 7 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
  • 8 Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Conserv Biol, 2024 Feb;38(1):e14172.
PMID: 37650444 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14172

Abstract

The expansion of oil palm plantations has led to land-use change and deforestation in the tropics, which has affected biodiversity. Although the impacts of the crop on terrestrial biodiversity have been extensively reviewed, its effects on freshwater biodiversity remain relatively unexplored. We reviewed the research assessing the impacts of forest-to-oil palm conversion on freshwater biota and the mitigating effect of riparian buffers on these impacts. We searched for studies comparing taxa richness, species abundance, and community composition of macroinvertebrates, amphibians, and fish in streams in forests (primary and disturbed) and oil palm plantations with and without riparian buffers. Then, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the overall effect of the land-use change on the 3 taxonomic groups. Twenty-nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. On average, plantations lacking buffers hosted 44% and 19% fewer stream taxa than primary and disturbed forests, respectively. Stream taxa on plantations with buffers were 24% lower than in primary forest and did not differ significantly from disturbed forest. In contrast, stream community composition differed between forests and plantations regardless of the presence of riparian buffers. These differences were attributed to agrochemical use and altered environmental conditions in the plantations, including temperature changes, worsened water conditions, microhabitat loss, and food and shelter depletion. On aggregate, abundance did not differ significantly among land uses because increases in generalist species offset the population decline of vulnerable forest specialists in the plantation. Our results reveal significant impacts of forest-to-oil palm conversion on freshwater biota, particularly taxa richness and composition (but not aggregate abundance). Although preserving riparian buffers in the plantations can mitigate the loss of various aquatic species, it cannot conserve primary forest communities. Therefore, safeguarding primary forests from the oil palm expansion is crucial, and further research is needed to address riparian buffers as a promising mitigation strategy in agricultural areas.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.