Affiliations 

  • 1 Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • 2 Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia. siewchinong@usm.my
  • 3 Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
  • 4 Department of Public Health, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan
  • 5 Ibn Sina Community Clinic South Wilcrest Drive, Houston, TX, 77099, USA
  • 6 Pak-Austria Fachhochschule: Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Haripur, KPK, Pakistan
  • 7 Faculty of Medicine and Community Health, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 8 Umar Diabetes and Foot Care Centre and Umar Diabetes Foundation, Office 1, Executive Complex, G8 Markaz, Islamabad, 46000, Pakistan
  • 9 Department of Pharmacy, Punjab University College of Pharmacy, Allama Iqbal Campus, University of the Punjab, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan
  • 10 Department of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
Sci Rep, 2023 Dec 27;13(1):23037.
PMID: 38155289 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50517-2

Abstract

In 2021, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reported that the prevalence of diabetes in Pakistan was 9.6%, higher than the global average. However, adherence to treatment guidelines, e.g., American Diabetes Association and Pakistan Endocrine Society and prescription patterns for Oral anti-diabetes (OAD), is poorly understood in Pakistan. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the prescribing practices of anti-diabetic medications, an association of lifestyle modification with drugs prescribed, and their effectiveness in preserving ideal glycemic levels in diabetic patients undergoing treatment in tertiary care teaching hospitals in rural and urban Pakistan. In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from prescriptions of outpatient diabetic patients from different rural and urban tertiary care hospitals between October 2021 and February 2022. 388 participants were enrolled in the study for a detailed interview on prescription evaluation and glycemic control. The coinvestigators conducted an interview with the patient and used a pre-validated questionnaire to collect the data. The relationship between following treatment guidelines and clinical and demographic factors was found using chi-square tests for bivariate analyses. The study reported that out of 388, the mean ages of the patients were 48 ± 12.4, and the majority were female. It was observed that 60.1% and 66.5% have uncontrolled fasting and random blood glucose, respectively. The education level of the study participants was also below par to have a complete understanding of the medical condition and self-management therapy. Even though they were taking the right medications-an average prescription regimen included 5.08 medications-52.1% of the studied people had glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels higher than the therapeutic threshold set by the International Diabetes Federation. In this modern era, it was observed that the prescribing trend was still focused on traditional therapeutic options Biguanides, sulfonylureas, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were prescribed in 64.6% of the patients. A significant association was found between glycemic control and body mass index, adherence to lifestyle modifications, and the number of medications prescribed (p-value 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.