Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Sapporo Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan
  • 3 Department of Urology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
  • 4 Department of Urology, Selayang Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 5 Department of Urology, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of Urology, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuching, Malaysia
  • 7 Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
  • 8 Department of Surgery, Sultanah Bahiyah Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Alor Setar, Malaysia
  • 9 Department of Urology, Penang Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • 10 Department of Urology, Sultanah Aminah Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • 11 Department of Surgery, Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kota Bahru, Malaysia
  • 12 Strategic Investigation on Comprehensive Cancer Network, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies/Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Cancer Med, 2020 12;9(24):9346-9352.
PMID: 33098372 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3548

Abstract

The J-CAPRA score is an assessment tool which stratifies risk and predicts outcome of primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) using prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and clinical TNM staging. Here, we aimed to assess the generalisability of this tool in multi-ethnic Asians. Performance of J-CAPRA was evaluated in 782 Malaysian and 16,946 Japanese patients undergoing ADT from the Malaysian Study Group of Prostate Cancer (M-CaP) and Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer (J-CaP) databases, respectively. Using the original J-CAPRA, 69.6% metastatic (M1) cases without T and/or N staging were stratified as intermediate-risk disease in the M-CaP database. To address this, we first omitted clinical T and N stage variables, and calculated the score on a 0-8 scale in the modified J-CAPRA scoring system for M1 patients. Notably, treatment decisions of M1 cases were not directly affected by both T and N staging. The J-CAPRA score threshold was adjusted for intermediate (modified J-CAPRA score 3-5) and high-risk (modified J-CAPRA score ≥6) groups in M1 patients. Using J-CaP database, validation analysis showed that overall survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival of modified intermediate and high-risk groups were comparable to those of original J-CAPRA (p > 0.05) with Cohen's coefficient of 0.65. Around 88% M1 cases from M-CaP database were reclassified into high-risk category. Modified J-CAPRA scoring system is instrumental in risk assessment and treatment outcome prediction for M1 patients without T and/or N staging.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.