Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Medical Education, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • 2 Department of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan
  • 3 Department of Oral Surgery, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan
  • 4 Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 5 Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 6 Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Work, 2020;67(4):791-798.
PMID: 33325429 DOI: 10.3233/WOR-203332

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the self-perceived competency (FSPC) of medical faculty in E-Teaching and support received during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS: An online well-structured and validated faculty self-perceived competency questionnaire was used to collect responses from medical faculty. The questionnaire consisted of four purposely build sections on competence in student engagement, instructional strategy, technical communication and time management. The responses were recorded using a Likert ordinal scale (1-9). The Questionnaire was uploaded at www.surveys.google.com and the link was distributed through social media outlets and e-mails. Descriptive statistics and Independent paired t-test were used for analysis and comparison of quantitative and qualitative variables. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: A total of 738 responses were assessed. Nearly 54% (397) participants had less than 5 years of teaching experience, 24.7% (182) had 6-10 years and 11.7% (86) had 11-15 years teaching expertise. 75.6% (558) respondents have delivered online lectures during the pandemic. Asynchronous methods were used by 61% (450) and synchronous by 39% (288) of participants. Moreover, 22.4% (165) participants revealed that their online lectures were evaluated by a structured feedback from experts, while 38.3% participants chose that their lectures were not evaluated. A significant difference (p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.