SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Case-control study at Rheumatology Clinic of Universiti Sains Malaysia Hospital.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sera of SLE patients and HCs were tested for the presence of anti-CLIC2 and anti-HMGB1 autoantibodies using human recombinant proteins and ELISA methodologies. Other serological parameters were evaluated according to routine procedures, and patients' demographic and clinical data were obtained.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: Anti-CLIC2 autoantibody levels were significantly higher in SLE patients compared to HCs (P = 0.0035), whereas anti-HMGB1 autoantibody levels were not significantly elevated (P = 0.7702). Anti-CLIC2 and anti-HMGB1 autoantibody levels were not associated with ANA pattern, anti-dsDNA, and CRP. Interestingly, SLEDAI score (≥6) was associated with anti-CLIC2 (P = 0.0046) and with anti-HMGB1 (P = 0.0091) autoantibody levels.
CONCLUSION: Our findings support the potential of using anti-CLIC2 autoantibodies as a novel biomarker for SLE patients. Both anti-CLIC2 and anti-HMGB1 autoantibody levels demonstrated potential in monitoring SLE disease activity.
CASE PRESENTATION: We described a 60-year-old man diagnosed with COVID-19 infection and later presented with a two-week history of myalgia, progressive limb weakness, and dysphagia. He had a Creatinine Kinase (CK) level of more than 10,000 U/L, was strongly positive for anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti-Ro52 antibody, and a muscle biopsy revealed a paucity-inflammation necrotizing myopathy with randomly distributed necrotic fibers, which was consistent with necrotizing autoimmune myositis (NAM). He responded well clinically and biochemically to intravenous immunoglobulin, steroids and immunosuppressant and he was able to resume to his baseline.
CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 may be associated with late-onset necrotizing myositis, mimicking autoimmune inflammatory myositis.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to provide readers with an update on the evaluation, diagnosis, and the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis.
METHODS: A PubMed search was performed in Clinical Queries using the key term "juvenile dermatomyositis" in the search engine. The search strategy included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews. The search was restricted to English literature. The information retrieved from the above search was used in the compilation of the present article.
RESULTS: Juvenile dermatomyositis is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory condition characterized by systemic capillary vasculopathy that primarily affects the skin and muscles with possible involvement of other organs. In 2017, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) developed diagnostic criteria for juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and juvenile dermatomyositis. In the absence of muscle biopsies which are infrequently performed in children, scores (in brackets) are assigned to four variables related to muscle weakness, three variables related to skin manifestations, one variable related to other clinical manifestations, and two variables related to laboratory measurements to discriminate idiopathic inflammatory myopathies from non-idiopathic inflammatory myopathies as follows: objective symmetric weakness, usually progressive, of the proximal upper extremities (0.7); objective symmetric weakness, usually progressive, of the proximal lower extremities (0.8); neck flexors relatively weaker than neck extensors (1.9); leg proximal muscles relatively weaker than distal muscles (0.9); heliotrope rash (3.1); Gottron papules (2.1); Gottron sign (3.3); dysphagia or esophageal dysmotility (0.7); the presence of anti-Jo-1 autoantibody (3.9); and elevated serum levels of muscle enzymes (1.3). In the absence of muscle biopsy, a definite diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy can be made if the total score is ≥7.5. Patients whose age at onset of symptoms is less than 18 years and who meet the above criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and have a heliotrope rash, Gottron papules or Gottron sign are deemed to have juvenile dermatomyositis. The mainstay of therapy at the time of diagnosis is a high-dose corticosteroid (oral or intravenous) in combination with methotrexate.
CONCLUSION: For mild to moderate active muscle disease, early aggressive treatment with high-dose oral prednisone alone or in combination with methotrexate is the cornerstone of management. Pulse intravenous methylprednisolone is often preferred to oral prednisone in more severely affected patients, patients who respond poorly to oral prednisone, and those with gastrointestinal vasculopathy. Other steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide are reserved for patients with contraindications or intolerance to methotrexate and for refractory cases, as the use of these agents is associated with more adverse events. Various biological agents have been used in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis. Data on their efficacy are limited, and their use in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis is considered investigational.
METHODS: A state-wide cross-sectional study was conducted. There were 336 native renal biopsies in 296 eligible patients from 1st January 2013 to 30th June 2016. All patients aged ≥12 years with sufficient sampling (≥8 glomeruli) for histopathological assessment were included. Graft kidney biopsies, protocol-based biopsies and patients with uncertain demographics were excluded. Demographics of patients, clinical data, laboratory parameters prior to biopsy, and histology findings of renal biopsies were collected from local unit database and recorded into a standardised data collection form. Descriptive statistical analyses were employed and factors associated with Lupus nephritis (LN) were explored using logistic regression.
RESULTS: The mean age during biopsy was 34.53 years (Standard Deviation 0.759). Primary glomerulonephritis (PGN) accounted for 42.6% (126) of all native renal biopsies. The commonest cause of PGN was minimal change disease (38.9%, 49) followed by focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (33.3%, 42) and IgA nephropathy (14.3%, 18). LN is the leading cause for secondary glomerulonephritis (SGN) (87.2%, 136). Younger age (Odds Ratio, OR 0.978; 95% Confidence Interval, 95%CI 0.960, 0.996); female gender (OR 17.53; p<0.001); significant proteinuria (OR 132.0; p<0.001); creatinine level at biopsy (OR 11.26; p=0.004); positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) (OR 46.7; p<0.001); and ANA patterns (OR 8.038; p=0.018) were significant in predicting the odds of having LN.
CONCLUSION: This is the first epidemiology study of glomerular diseases in Sabah. The predominance of LN suggests lower threshold for renal biopsy in patients with suspected glomerular disorders. We have identified significant predictors for early detection and treatment of LN.