OBJECTIVES: The anti-inflammatory and anti-catabolic actions of Diclofenac were compared with apigenin-C-glycosides rich Clinacanthus nutans (CN) leaf extract in osteoporotic-osteoarthritis rats.
METHODS: Female Sprague Dawley rats were randomized into five groups (n = 6). Four groups were bilateral ovariectomised for osteoporosis development, and osteoarthritis were induced by intra-articular injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) into the right knee joints. The Sham group was sham-operated, received saline injection and deionized drinking water. The treatment groups were orally given 200 or 400 mg extract/kg body weight or 5 mg diclofenac /kg body weight daily for 28 days. Articular cartilage and bone changes were monitored by gross and histological structures, micro-CT analysis, serum protein biomarkers, and mRNA expressions for inflammation and catabolic protease genes.
RESULTS: HPLC analysis confirmed that apigenin-C-glycosides (shaftoside, vitexin, and isovitexin) were the major compounds in the extract. The extract significantly and dose-dependently reduced cartilage erosion, bone loss, cartilage catabolic changes, serum osteoporotic-osteoarthritis biomarkers (procollagen-type-II-N-terminal-propeptide PIINP; procollagen-type-I-N-terminal-propeptide PINP; osteocalcin), inflammation (IL-1β) and mRNA expressions for nuclear-factor-kappa-beta NF-κβ, interleukin-1-beta IL-1β, cyclooxygenase-2; and matrix-metalloproteinase-13 MMP13 activities, in osteoporotic-osteoarthritis rats comparable to Diclofenac.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that apigenin-C-glycosides at 400 mg CN extract/kg (about 0.2 mg apigenin-equivalent/kg) is comparable to diclofenac in suppressing inflammation and catabolic proteases for osteoporotic-osteoarthritis prevention. Graphical abstract.
AIMS: The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of rectal diclofenac in preventing PEP and to evaluate any adverse events.
METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, two-arm, prospective clinical trial. Only patients at high risk of developing PEP were recruited. They received 100 mg rectal diclofenac or no intervention immediately after ERCP. The patients were reviewed 30 days after discharge to evaluate any adverse event.
RESULTS: Among 144 recruited patients, 69 (47.9%) received diclofenac and 75 (52.1%) had no intervention. Eleven patients (7.6%) developed PEP, in which seven were from the diclofenac group and four were in the control group. Eight cases of PEP (5.5%) were mild and three cases (2.1%) were moderate. The differences in pancreatitis incidence and severity between both groups were not statistically significant. There were 11 adverse events reported. Clinically significant bleeding happened in four patients (2.8%): one from the diclofenac group and three from the control group. Other events included cholangitis: two patients (2.9%) from the diclofenac group and four (5.3%) from the control group. One patient from the diclofenac group (1.4%) had a perforation which was treated conservatively.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, prophylactic rectal diclofenac did not significantly decrease the incidence of PEP among patients at high risk for developing PEP. However, the administration of diclofenac was fairly safe with few clinical adverse events.
METHODS: The antibacterial activity of four NSAIDs (aspirin, ibuprofen, diclofenac and mefenamic acid) were tested against ten pathogenic bacterial strains using the microdilution broth method. The interaction between NSAIDs and antibiotics (cefuroxime/chloramphenicol) was estimated by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration (FICI) of the combination.
RESULTS: Aspirin, ibuprofen and diclofenac exhibited antibacterial activity against the selected pathogenic bacteria. The interaction between ibuprofen/aspirin with cefuroxime was demonstrated to be synergistic against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and the MRSA reference strain, whereas for MRSA clinical strains additive effects were observed for both NSAIDs and cefuroxime combinations. The combination of chloramphenicol with ibuprofen/aspirin was synergistic against all of the tested MRSA strains and displayed an additive effect against MSSA. A 4-8192-fold reduction in the cefuroxime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and a 4-64-fold reduction of the chloramphenicol MIC were documented.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the NSAIDs ibuprofen and aspirin showed antibacterial activity against strains of S. aureus. Although individually less potent than common antibiotics, these NSAIDs are synergistic in action with cefuroxime and chloramphenicol and could potentially be used as adjuvants in combating multidrug-resistant MRSA.