METHODS: The study utilized the docked dataset (Induced Fit Docking with Glide XP scoring function) from Loo et al., consisting of 46 ligands-23 agonists and 23 antagonists. The equilibrated structures from Loo et al. were subjected to 30 ns production simulations using GROMACS 2018 at 300 K and 1 atm with the velocity rescaling thermostat and the Parinello-Rahman barostat. AMBER ff99SB*-ILDN was used for the proteins, General Amber Force Field (GAFF) was used for the ligands, and Slipids parameters were used for lipids. MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA binding free energies were then calculated using gmx_MMPBSA. The solute dielectric constant was varied between 1, 2, and 4 to study the effect of different solute dielectric constants on the performance of MM/PB(GB)SA. The effect of entropy on MM/PB(GB)SA binding free energies was evaluated using the interaction entropy module implemented in gmx_MMPBSA. Five GB models, GBHCT, GBOBC1, GBOBC2, GBNeck, and GBNeck2, were evaluated to study the effect of the choice of GB models in the performance of MM/GBSA. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure the correlation between experimental and predicted binding free energies.
PURPOSE: The present investigation was undertaken to characterize the interaction between 6-shogaol and the main in vivo transporter, human serum albumin (HSA).
METHODS: Various binding characteristics of 6-shogaol-HSA interaction were studied using fluorescence spectroscopy. Thermal stability of 6-shogaol-HSA system was determined by circular dichroism (CD) and differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) techniques. Identification of the 6-shogaol binding site on HSA was made by competitive drug displacement and molecular docking experiments.
RESULTS: Fluorescence quench titration results revealed the association constant, Ka of 6-shogaol-HSA interaction as 6.29 ± 0.33 × 10(4) M(-1) at 25 ºC. Values of the enthalpy change (-11.76 kJ mol(-1)) and the entropy change (52.52 J mol(-1) K(-1)), obtained for the binding reaction suggested involvement of hydrophobic and van der Waals forces along with hydrogen bonds in the complex formation. Higher thermal stability of HSA was noticed in the presence of 6-shogaol, as revealed by DSC and thermal denaturation profiles. Competitive ligand displacement experiments along with molecular docking results suggested the binding preference of 6-shogaol for Sudlow's site I of HSA.
CONCLUSION: All these results suggest that 6-shogaol binds to Sudlow's site I of HSA through moderate binding affinity and involves hydrophobic and van der Waals forces along with hydrogen bonds.