Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Packaging, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Food Packaging and Handling Program, Food Technology Research Centre, MARDI, 50774 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Food Science, Florida A & M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
  • 3 Department of Animal Science/Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • 4 School of Packaging, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Electronic address: ealmenar@msu.edu
Meat Sci, 2016 Mar;113:116-23.
PMID: 26656870 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.11.023

Abstract

The goal of this study was to validate the commercial feasibility of a novel casing formed from chitosan containing cinnamaldehyde (2.2%, w/v), glycerol (50%, w/w) and Tween 80 (0.2% w/w) under traditional sausage manufacturing conditions. Meat batter was stuffed into both chitosan and collagen (control) casings and cooked in a water bath. Before and after cooking, both casings were compared for mechanical, barrier, and other properties. Compared to collagen, the chitosan casing was a better (P≤0.05) barrier to water, oxygen, liquid smoke, and UV light. In mechanical and other properties, the chitosan casing had higher (P≤0.05) tensile strength, lower (P≤0.05) elongation at break and tensile energy to break, and better (P≤0.05) transparency whereas a similar (P>0.05) water solubility to the collagen casing. Overall, the chitosan casing was less affected by sausage manufacturing conditions than the collagen casing, indicating that chitosan casing has potential as an alternative to the current collagen casing in the manufacture of sausages.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.