Affiliations 

  • 1 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute for Medical Research, Jalan Pahang, 50588, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. kee@imr.gov.my
  • 2 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute for Medical Research, Jalan Pahang, 50588, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Institute for Public Health, Jalan Bangsar, Federal Hill, 50590, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4 Universiti Utara Malaysia, UUM, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
  • 5 Allied Health Sciences College Sg. Buloh, Jalan Hospital, 47000, Sg. Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
BMC Med Res Methodol, 2017 Jun 02;17(1):85.
PMID: 28577547 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0362-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-reported weight and height are commonly used in lieu of direct measurements of weight and height in large epidemiological surveys due to inevitable constraints such as budget and human resource. However, the validity of self-reported weight and height, particularly among adolescents, needs to be verified as misreporting could lead to misclassification of body mass index and therefore overestimation or underestimation of the burden of BMI-related diseases. The objective of this study was to determine the validity of self-reported weight and height among Malaysian secondary school children.

METHODS: Both self-reported and directly measured weight and height of a subgroup of 663 apparently healthy schoolchildren from the Malaysian Adolescent Health Risk Behaviour (MyAHRB) survey 2013/2014 were analysed. Respondents were required to report their current body weight and height via a self-administrative questionnaire before they were measured by investigators. The validity of self-reported against directly measured weight and height was examined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Bland-Altman plot and weighted Kappa statistics.

RESULTS: There was very good intraclass correlation between self-reported and directly measured weight [r = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93, 0.97] and height (r = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90, 0.96). In addition the Bland-Altman plots indicated that the mean difference between self-reported and direct measurement was relatively small. The mean difference (self-reported minus direct measurements) was, for boys: weight, -2.1 kg; height, -1.6 cm; BMI, -0.44 kg/m2 and girls: weight, -1.2 kg; height, -0.9 cm; BMI, -0.3 kg/m2. However, 95% limits of agreement were wide which indicated substantial discrepancies between self-reported and direct measurements method at the individual level. Nonetheless, the weighted Kappa statistics demonstrated a substantial agreement between BMI status categorised based on self-reported weight and height and the direct measurements (kappa = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.84).

CONCLUSION: Our results show that the self-reported weight and height were consistent with direct measurements and therefore can be used in assessing the nutritional status of Malaysian school children from the age of 13 to 17 years old in epidemiological studies and for surveillance purposes when direct measurements are not feasible, but not for assessing nutritional status at the individual level.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.