• 1 Entomology Division, Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, New Tafo-Akim, Ghana.
  • 2 Molecular Entomology Research Group, School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • 3 African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2017 Sep;24(26):21138-21145.
PMID: 28730366 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9737-3


Although evidence of mosquito coils' impact on disease epidemiology is limited, they are popularized as mosquito-borne disease prevention devices. Their usage affects the environment, human and mosquito health. This study investigated the perception, usage pattern and efficacy of coils in a predominantly poor malaria-endemic Ghanaian peri-urban area. Information on protection methods, perception and usage pattern was garnered using questionnaires. The efficacy of commonly used coils in the area was then assessed on the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae, in a glass chamber. Sole or co-application of mosquito control methods and risky usage practices were reported. Coils were deemed harmful to humans and mosquitoes, and their perceived effectiveness varied, with several factors influencing their purchase. High d-allethrin concentration coils induced quicker mosquito knockdown; however, mortality was less than 85%. The coil usage pattern compromises users' health and can enhance mosquito tolerance to d-allethrin. The coils were ineffective against the vector, outlining a dichotomy between the users' perception of efficacy and the observed efficacy. Hence, the usage of other safer and more effective vector control methods should be encouraged to protect households.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications