Affiliations 

  • 1 Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: esteinmrl@aol.com
  • 2 Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
  • 3 Department of Paediatrics and Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 4 Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 5 ECOGENE-21 Clinical and Translational Research Center and Lipidology Unit, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
  • 6 Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques St. Luc, Service de Gastroentérologie et Hépatologie Pédiatrique, Brussels, Belgium
  • 7 Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
  • 8 Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM), Clinical Trial Unit, Level 2, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • 9 AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Gaithersburg, Maryland
  • 10 AstraZeneca Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
  • 11 Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolism Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017 Aug 29;70(9):1162-1170.
PMID: 28838366 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.058

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), a rare genetic disorder, is characterized by extremely elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Statin treatment starts at diagnosis, but no statin has been formally evaluated in, or approved for, HoFH children.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to assess the LDL-C efficacy of rosuvastatin versus placebo in HoFH children, and the relationship with underlying genetic mutations.

METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, 12-week, crossover study of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus placebo, followed by 12 weeks of open-label rosuvastatin. Patients discontinued all lipid-lowering treatment except ezetimibe and/or apheresis. Clinical and laboratory assessments were performed every 6 weeks. The relationship between LDL-C response and genetic mutations was assessed by adding children and adults from a prior HoFH rosuvastatin trial.

RESULTS: Twenty patients were screened, 14 randomized, and 13 completed the study. The mean age was 10.9 years; 8 patients were on ezetimibe and 7 on apheresis. Mean LDL-C was 481 mg/dl (range: 229 to 742 mg/dl) on placebo and 396 mg/dl (range: 130 to 700 mg/dl) on rosuvastatin, producing a mean 85.4 mg/dl (22.3%) difference (p = 0.005). Efficacy was similar regardless of age or use of ezetimibe or apheresis, and was maintained for 12 weeks. Adverse events were few and not serious. Patients with 2 defective versus 2 negative LDL receptor mutations had mean LDL-C reductions of 23.5% (p = 0.0044) and 14% (p = 0.038), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: This first-ever pediatric HoFH statin trial demonstrated safe and effective LDL-C reduction with rosuvastatin 20 mg alone or added to ezetimibe and/or apheresis. The LDL-C response in children and adults was related to underlying genetic mutations. (A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin in Children and Adolescents With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [HYDRA]; NCT02226198).

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.