Affiliations 

  • 1 College of Geology & Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China. Electronic address: chenwei0930@xust.edu.cn
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Mine Geological Hazards Mechanism and Control, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; Shaanxi Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China
  • 3 College of Geology & Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China
  • 4 College of Geology & Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Land and Resources, China
  • 5 Department of Geophysics, Young Researchers and Elites Club, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • 6 School of Mining & Civil Engineering, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui 553000, Guizhou, China
  • 7 Department of Geoinformation, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
Sci Total Environ, 2018 Sep 01;634:853-867.
PMID: 29653429 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.055

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to produce groundwater spring potential maps using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence (WoE) with logistic regression (LR) and functional tree (FT) models. First, a total of 66 springs were identified by field surveys, out of which 70% of the spring locations were used for training the models and 30% of the spring locations were employed for the validation process. Second, a total of 14 affecting factors including aspect, altitude, slope, plan curvature, profile curvature, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), sediment transport index (STI), lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land use, soil, distance to roads, and distance to streams was used to analyze the spatial relationship between these affecting factors and spring occurrences. Multicollinearity analysis and feature selection of the correlation attribute evaluation (CAE) method were employed to optimize the affecting factors. Subsequently, the novel ensembles of the WoE, LR, and FT models were constructed using the training dataset. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, standard error, confidence interval (CI) at 95%, and significance level P were employed to validate and compare the performance of three models. Overall, all three models performed well for groundwater spring potential evaluation. The prediction capability of the FT model, with the highest AUC values, the smallest standard errors, the narrowest CIs, and the smallest P values for the training and validation datasets, is better compared to those of other models. The groundwater spring potential maps can be adopted for the management of water resources and land use by planners and engineers.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.