Affiliations 

  • 1 Healthcare Statistics Unit, National Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health, 3rd Floor, MMA House, 124 Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Clinical Research Ward, Ampang Hospital, Ministry of Health, Jalan Mewah Utara, Pandan Mewah, Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia
Int J Qual Health Care, 2019 Aug 01;31(7):37-43.
PMID: 30608582 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy252

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of self-management support (SMS) provided to primary care patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension and its associated factors.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey conducted between April and May 2017.

SETTING: Forty public clinics in Malaysia.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 956 adult patients with T2D and/or hypertension were interviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient experience on SMS was evaluated using a structured questionnaire of the short version Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument, PACIC-M11. Linear regression analysis adjusting for complex survey design was used to determine the association of patient and clinic factors with PACIC-M11 scores.

RESULTS: The overall PACIC-M11 mean was 2.3(SD,0.8) out of maximum of 5. The subscales' mean scores were lowest for patient activation (2.1(SD,1.1)) and highest for delivery system design/decision support (2.9(SD,0.9)). Overall PACIC-M11 score was associated with age, educational level and ethnicity. Higher overall PACIC-M11 ratings was observed with increasing difference between actual and expected consultation duration [β = 0.01; 95% CI (0.001, 0.03)]. Better scores were also observed among patients who would recommend the clinic to friends and family [β = 0.19; 95% CI (0.03, 0.36)], when health providers were able to explain things in ways that were easy to understand [β = 0.34; 95% CI (0.10, 0.59)] and knew about patients' living conditions [β = 0.31; 95% CI (0.15, 0.47)].

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated patients received low levels of SMS. PACIC-M11 ratings were associated with age, ethnicity, educational level, difference between actual and expected consultation length, willingness to recommend the clinic and provider communication skills.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.