Affiliations 

  • 1 Head and Consultant, Wound Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Malaysia
  • 2 Consultant Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Jupiter Hospital, Mumbai, India
  • 3 Consultant and Head of Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gleneagles Global Hospital, Chennai, India
  • 4 Head of Endocrinology Department. Chongqing Emergency Medical Centre, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China
  • 5 Department of Surgery, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 6 International Medical Director, Urgo Education and Training Alliance, Singapore
J Wound Care, 2021 Apr 01;30(Sup4):S42-S52.
PMID: 33856929 DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup4.S42

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Management of chronic wounds remains one of the major challenges for health professionals and patients. An evidence-based decision is important to ensure that patients are receiving the best treatment proven to reduce healing time and improve outcomes, including economic benefits and patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Due to recent restrictions because of the COVID-19 pandemic, including closure of wound care centres within hospitals and a drop in patient volume, chronic wound management needs simple-to-use dressings which are still effective and evidence-based solutions. This systematic review was conducted to identify the clinical evidence available on a sucrose octasulfate dressing (TLC-NOSF, UrgoStart dressing range, Laboratoires Urgo, France) to explore its efficacy in the management of chronic wounds, particularly lower limb ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers.

METHOD: A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was conducted based on the PICO model (patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) to retrieve publications of different levels of evidence in order to evaluate outcomes of the use of TLC-NOSF dressings.

RESULTS: A total of 21 publications of different levels, ranging from double-blind randomised control trials to case reports, involving over 12,000 patients, were identified through PubMed, with a further eight publications through Google Scholar and two publications through Cochrane Library. A total of seven results were omitted due to the lack of relevance or repetition.

CONCLUSION: All the evidence provided suggest that these dressings provide clinicians with an evidence-based option for the management of chronic wounds; that the TLC-NOSF dressings are beneficial in promoting the healing process, reducing healing times, enhancing patients' HRQoL, and in allowing a more cost-effective procedure.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.