Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane register of trials systematically for studies that examined treatment options for patients with MDR- and XDR-AB infections until April 2016. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI from both direct and indirect evidence. Primary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological cure. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and nephrotoxic and non-nephrotoxic adverse events.
Results: A total of 29 studies with 2529 patients (median age 60 years; 65% male; median APACHE II score 19.0) were included. Although there were no statistically significant differences between treatment options, triple therapy with colistin, sulbactam and tigecycline had the highest clinical cure rate. Colistin in combination with sulbactam was associated with a significantly higher microbiological cure rate compared with colistin in combination with tigecycline (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.03-1.47) and colistin monotherapy (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.06-1.38). No significant differences in all-cause mortality were noted between treatment options. Tigecycline-based therapy also appeared less effective for achieving a microbiological cure and is not appropriate for treating bloodstream MDR- and XDR-AB infections.
Conclusions: Combination therapy of colistin with sulbactam demonstrates superiority in terms of microbiological cure with a safety profile similar to that of colistin monotherapy. Thus, our findings support the use of this combination as a treatment for MDR- and XDR-AB infections.
METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2016, we enrolled 135 patients with MDR-TB from drug resistance programmes at four major TB centres in Yemen for this prospective study. After exclusion of 20 patients, treatment outcomes were reported for 115 patients who attended a series of follow-ups.
RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with MDR-TB were analysed from the four main TB centres in Yemen. Most patients (35.2%) were from the Aden TB centre. A success rate of 77.4% was reported for TB treatment. Of the 115 patients, 69.6% were resistant to two drugs, 18.3% were resistant to three drugs, and 12.2% were resistant to four drugs. During the intensive phase of treatment, 19 patients (16.5%) reported one or more adverse events. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a baseline body weight of ≤40 kg [p = 0.016; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 25.09], comorbidity (p = 0.049; AOR = 4.73), baseline lung cavities (p = 0.004; AOR = 15.32), and positive culture at the end of the intensive phase (p = 0.009; AOR = 8.83) were associated with the unsuccessful treatment outcomes in drug-resistant TB patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate achieved after treatment was below the levels established by the WHO End TB Strategy (90%) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (80%). Identification of risk factors associated with MDR-TB in Yemen is essential because it allows health workers to identify high-risk patients, especially in the absence of a second-line treatment or a laboratory diagnostic method. The Yemen National Tuberculosis Control Program should formulate new strategies for early detection of MDR-TB and invest in new programmes for MDR-TB management.
METHODS: A retrospective study identifying all children aged drug resistant, nearly all other isolates were susceptible to most antimicrobials, including ampicillin.
CONCLUSIONS: Bintulu Division in Sarawak observed a very high incidence of childhood iNTS infections. Enteric fever was uncommon. The epidemiology of invasive Salmonella infections in Malaysian Borneo differs considerably from that of neighbouring countries in Asia.