OBJECTIVES: Using diffusion tensor cardiac magnetic resonance (DT-CMR) we assessed myocardial disarray and fibrosis in both SARC+LVH- and HCM patients and evaluated the relationship between microstructural alterations and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters associated with arrhythmic risk.
METHODS: Sixty-two individuals (24 SARC+LVH-, 24 HCM and 14 matched controls) were evaluated with multiparametric CMR including stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) DT-CMR, and blinded quantitative 12-lead ECG analysis.
RESULTS: Mean diastolic fractional anisotropy (FA) was reduced in HCM compared to SARC+LVH- and controls (0.49±0.05 vs 0.52±0.04 vs 0.53±0.04, p=0.009), even after adjustment for differences in extracellular volume (ECV) (p=0.038). Both HCM and SARC+LVH- had segments with significantly reduced FA relative to controls (54% vs 25% vs 0%, p=0.002). Multiple repolarization parameters were prolonged in HCM and SARC+LVH-, with corrected JT interval (JTc) being most significant (354±42ms vs 356±26ms vs 314±26ms, p=0.002). Among SARC+LVH-, JTc duration correlated negatively with mean FA (r=-0.6, p=0.002). In HCM, the JTc interval showed a stronger association with ECV (r=0.6 p=0.019) than FA (r=-0.1 p=0.72). JTc discriminated SARC+LVH- from controls (Area-under-the-receiver-operator-curve 0.88, CI 0.76-1.00, p<0.001), and in HCM correlated with the ESC HCM sudden cardiac death risk score (r=0.5, p=0.014).
CONCLUSION: Low diastolic FA, suggestive of myocardial disarray, is present in both SARC+LVH- and HCM. Low FA and raised ECV were associated with repolarization prolongation. Myocardial disarray assessment using DT-CMR and repolarization parameters such as the JTc interval demonstrate significant potential as markers of disease activity in HCM.
DESIGN: Studies on the association between CT values and smear status were included in a descriptive systematic review. Authors of studies including smear, culture and Xpert results were asked for individual-level data, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated.
RESULTS: Of 918 citations, 10 were included in the descriptive systematic review. Fifteen data sets from studies potentially relevant for individual-level data meta-analysis provided individual-level data (7511 samples from 4447 patients); 1212 patients had positive Xpert results for at least one respiratory sample (1859 samples overall). ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95%CI 0.82-0.87). Cut-off CT values of 27.7 and 31.8 yielded sensitivities of 85% (95%CI 83-87) and 95% (95%CI 94-96) and specificities of 67% (95%CI 66-77) and 35% (95%CI 30-41) for smear-positive samples.
CONCLUSION: Xpert CT values and smear status were strongly associated. However, diagnostic accuracy at set cut-off CT values of 27.7 or 31.8 would not replace smear microscopy. How CT values compare with smear microscopy in predicting infectiousness remains to be seen.