METHODS: Two blinded assessors examined thirty-five patients with a history of recent lateral ankle sprain. The first assessor performed physical examination on the injured ankle by using the anterior drawer test and talar tilt test, and the second assessor performed dynamic and static ultrasound assessment for anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament. The clinical laxity grading and sonographic extent of ligamentous injury was graded into a three-point scale.
RESULTS: There was a moderate positive correlation between clinical test and ultrasound grading of anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament with Spearman's correlation coefficient values of 0.58 and 0.66 respectively. Clinical grading of anterior drawer test had 59.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.36-0.79) while ultrasound grading had 100.0% specificity (95% CI: 0.75-1.00), with positive likelihood ratio of 0.77 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.44 in detecting a complete (grade 3) anterior talofibular ligament tear (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the clinical grading of talar tilt test had 54.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.23-0.83) and ultrasound grading had 100.0% specificity (95% CI: 0.85-1.00), with positive likelihood ratio of 1.0 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.45 in detecting a complete grade 3 calcaneofibular ligament tear (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic ultrasound is recommended to determine the actual degree of disruption of the ligament especially when clinical grading under-grades the degree of tear. Grade 2 tears can vary from 10% tear to 90% tear causing the clinical correlation to become less strong. We recommend a new classification for ultrasound grading of grade 2 tears, which could result in a stronger correlation between clinical and ultrasound grading.
METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the post-operative pain score between BSCPB and LWI was conducted among patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Ropivacaine 0.50% was used in the study. Pain score was measured at 4, 12, 16 and 24 h after surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS). Subcutaneous injection of Tramadol was given whenever the pain score was ≥4 or requested by patients.
RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were recruited, with 35 patients on each arm. There was no statistical difference in the post-operative pain score between the two groups at 4 h (p = 0.208), 12 h (p = 0.860), 16 h (p = 0.376) and 24 h (p = 0.375) after surgery. Time to the first rescue dose of Tramadol between the two arms was also insignificant (p = 0.949). One patient in the BSCPB arm developed transient left upper limb weakness, which resolved 12 h after surgery.
CONCLUSION: LWI remains the simplest, safest and most economical method of pain management. While BSCPB is comparable, it does however, come with potential regional block related complications.
RESULTS: A first set of sORFs was identified from existing annotations that fitted the maximum of 80 residues criterion. A second set was predicted using parameters that specifically searched for ORF candidates of 80 codons or less in the exonic, intronic and intergenic sequences of the subject genomes. A total of 1986 conserved sORFs were predicted and characterized.
CONCLUSIONS: It is evident that numerous open reading frames that could potentially encode for polypeptides consisting of 80 amino acid residues or less are overlooked during standard gene prediction and annotation. From our results, additional targeted reannotation of genomes is clearly able to complement standard genome annotation to identify sORFs. Due to the lack of, and limitations with experimental validation, we propose that a simple conservation analysis can provide an acceptable means of ensuring that the predicted sORFs are sufficiently clear of gene prediction artefacts.
METHODS: Pooled urine samples of patients with BTG (n=10), patients with PTC (n=9) and healthy controls (n=10) were subjected to iTRAQ analysis and immunoblotting.
RESULTS: The ITRAQ analysis of the urine samples detected 646 proteins, 18 of which showed significant altered levels (p<0.01; fold-change>1.5) between patients and controls. Whilst four urinary proteins were commonly altered in both BTG and PTC patients, 14 were unique to either BTG or PTC. Amongst these, four proteins were further chosen for validation using immunoblotting, and the enhanced levels of osteopontin in BTG patients and increased levels of a truncated gelsolin fragment in PTC patients, relative to controls, appeared to corroborate the findings of the iTRAQ analysis.
CONCLUSION: The data of the present study is suggestive of the potential application of urinary osteopontin and gelsolin to discriminate patients with BTG from those with PTC non-invasively. However, this needs to be further validated in studies of individual urine samples.