METHODS: The visuals were analyzed by employing the Visual Discourses of Disability (ViDD) framework that juxtaposes the "perspectivizing-personizing" cline with the "enabling-disabling" continuum. The data studied comprise a total of 432 images sourced from three domains, namely (1) The Star, a Malaysian mainstream English newspaper (2012-2021); (2) Alzheimer's Disease Foundation Malaysia (ADFM) website (2019-2021); and (3) the Ministry of Health Malaysia (2019-2021) website. Findings from the visual analyses were corroborated by four representatives of ADFM in a group interview.
RESULTS: There is a predominance of stigmatized images, constructing dementia as a loss and deficit, thus depicting individuals in distanced suffering. Generic representations of people through stock images, a unique focus on the hands, representations of brain degeneration through abstractions and missing puzzle pieces are also prevalent. Despite these, the interview data confirmed that the perspectivizing aspect may be necessary to educate the public on what dementia entails. While personizing images that depict personhood and actual persons living with dementia are ideal, the use of stock images may be necessary if there is a need to maintain confidentiality and observe sensitivities. Similarly, images with positive emotions are encouraged but disabling ones are equally important to reflect reality and inculcate empathy.
CONCLUSION: When capturing, selecting and publishing images of dementia, organizations should deliberate on different visual elements which evoke empowerment, advocacy, handicapping and othering implications as outlined in the ViDD framework. Any decision should only be made after considering the purposes of publications and implications such images have on the intended audiences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CKD-CHECK (CKD-CHECK EGFR Chart in Kidney disease) is a toolkit that was developed to auto-generate patients' eGFR trend using a line graph, displaying the trend visually over a year. It identifies patients with rapid CKD progression, triggers the doctors to order appropriate tests (proteinuria quantification or renal imaging) and helps in decision making (continued monitoring at primary care level or referral to nephrologist). The toolkit was piloted among medical officers practising in a hospital-based primary care clinic treating patients with eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 using an interventional before-after study design from February to May 2022. In the preintervention period, the CKD patients were managed based on standard practice. The doctors then used the CKDCHECK toolkit on the same group of CKD patients during the intervention period. The feasibility and acceptability of the toolkit was assessed at the end of the study period using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) questionnaires. All patients' clinical data and referral rate were collected retrospectively through medical files and electronic data systems. Comparison between the pre- and post-intervention group were analysed using paired t-test and McNemar test, with statistical significance p value of <0.05.
RESULTS: A total of 25 medical officers used the toolkit on 60 CKD patients. The medical officers found the CKD-CHECK toolkit to be highly acceptable and feasible in primary care setting. The baseline characteristics of the patients were a mean age of 72 years old, predominantly females and Chinese ethnicity. Majority of the CKD patients had diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia. The numbers of CKD rapid progressors was similar (26.7% in the preintervention group vs 33.3% in the post-intervention group). There were no significant differences in terms of proteinuria assessment and ultrasound kidney for CKD rapid progressors before and after the intervention. However, a significant number of CKD rapid progressors were referred to nephrologists after the use of CKD-CHECK toolkit (p=0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: CKD-CHECK toolkit is acceptable and feasible to be used in primary care. Preliminary findings show that the CKD-CHECK toolkit improved the primary care doctor's referral of rapid CKD progressors to nephrologists.
OBJECTIVES: To determine incidences of pneumothorax developed spontaneously and during different modes of respiratory support, and risk factors associated with each type of pneumothorax.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of neonates in the Malaysian National Neonatal Registry.
SETTING: 44 Malaysian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
PARTICIPANTS: All neonates born in 2015-2020 and admitted to NICUs.
RESULTS: Pneumothorax developed in 3265 neonates: 37.5% occurred spontaneously, 62.5% during respiratory support. The incidence of all types of pneumothorax was 1.75 per 1000 livebirths, and of spontaneous pneumothorax was 0.58 per 1000 livebirths. Pneumothorax developed in 0.6% (450/70512) of neonates during continuous positive air way pressure therapy (nCPAPt), 1.8% (990/54994) of neonates during conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV), and 7.0% (599/8557) of neonates during high frequency ventilation (HFV). Term neonates had significantly higher pneumothorax rate than preterms (p<0.001). Multiple logistic regression analyses show that exposure to intermittent positive pressure ventilation and chest compression at birth were significant independent factors associated with increased risk of spontaneous pneumothorax and CMV, and persistent pulmonary hypertension was associated with increased risk of spontaneous pneumothorax and pneumothorax during CMV and HFV.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of pneumothorax was spontaneous in-onset. Neonates on HFV had the highest and those on nCPAPt the lowest rate of pneumothorax. Improving training of resuscitation techniques at birth and strategies of use of invasive modes of respiratory support may reduce incidences of all types of pneumothorax.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed articles published from January 2010 to December 2023, examining breast cancer risk factors in Asian women. Data were described narratively, estimates pooled, and prevalence and attributable proportions compared across Asian populations.
RESULTS: Of the 128 studies reviewed, 103 reported adjusted effect sizes for meta-analysis. Lifestyle and reproductive factors were predictive of breast cancer risk in Asian women, with varying impacts on pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. Relative risks were similar within Asian populations and in comparison to European populations, except for menarche, menopause, and hormone receptor therapy. However, risk factor distributions differed across populations. Whilst alcohol intake (21%) and oral contraceptive use (20%) emerged as the most attributable modifiable risk factors in Europeans, passive smoking (24%) and higher BMI (17%,≥24kg/m2 among post-menopausal women) were predominant in Asians.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that whilst the effects of lifestyle and reproductive breast cancer risk factors are largely similar across different populations, their distributions vary.
IMPACT: Our analysis underscores the importance of considering population-specific risk factor distributions when developing risk prediction tools for Asian populations.