MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 226 invasive breast carcinoma cases were selected and assembled into tissue microarrays (TMAs). The stromal expression of CD10 was immunohistochemically analysed.
RESULTS: Stromal CD10 was positive in 67 (29.6%) cases of invasive breast carcinoma. The frequency of positive stromal staining was significantly higher in the cases with ER-negative (P=0.000). CD10 stromal negativity was significantly higher in luminaltype cases (P=0.001). However, there was no correlation between stromal CD10 expression with tumour grade, stage, PR and HER2 status.
CONCLUSION: Positive CD10 stromal expression correlates with ER-negative invasive breast carcinomas, while negative CD10 stromal expression correlates with luminal type invasive breast carcinomas. This demonstrates that stromal CD10 expression within the TME constitutes a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target. Future studies are necessary to evaluate other stromal markers within the TME immunohistochemically as well as its molecular basis in order to confirm the definite role of stromal CD10.
METHOD: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using administrative data from three public tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. Data for hospital admissions between 1 March 2019 and 1 March 2020 with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for acute myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), hypertensive heart disease, stroke, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) were retrieved from the Malaysian Disease Related Group (Malaysian DRG) Casemix System. Patients were stratified by T2DM status for analyses. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing treatment costs.
RESULTS: Of the 1,183 patients in our study cohort, approximately 60.4% had T2DM. The most common CVDE was acute MI (25.6%), followed by IHD (25.3%), hypertensive heart disease (18.9%), stroke (12.9%), heart failure (9.4%), cardiomyopathy (5.7%) and PVD (2.1%). Nearly two-thirds (62.4%) of the patients had at least one cardiovascular risk factor, with hypertension being the most prevalent (60.4%). The treatment cost for all CVDEs was RM 4.8 million and RM 3.7 million in the T2DM and non-T2DM group, respectively. IHD incurred the largest cost in both groups, constituting 30.0% and 50.0% of the total CVDE treatment cost for patients with and without T2DM, respectively. Predictors of high treatment cost included male gender, non-minority ethnicity, IHD diagnosis and moderate-to-high severity level.
CONCLUSION: This study provides real-world cost estimates for CVDE hospitalisation and quantifies the combined burden of two major non-communicable disease categories at the public health provider level. Our results confirm that CVDs are associated with substantial health utilisation in both T2DM and non-T2DM patients.