DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and CENTRAL were searched systematically from their inception until June 2018.
REVIEW METHODS: All the randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were included.
RESULTS: Twelve trials were eligible (n = 1867) for inclusion in the data synthesis. In comparison to the placebo cohort, the levosimendan cohort showed a significant reduction in mortality (TSA = inconclusive; ρ = 0.002; I2 = 0%; FEM: OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.39, 0.80), especially in the subgroups of preoperative severe low LVEF ≤ 30% (ρ = 0.003; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16, 0.69), preoperative administering of levosimendan (ρ = 0.001; OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.29, 0.74) and patients who had bolus followed by infusion of levosimendan (ρ = 0.005; OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30, 0.81). However, the effect on mortality was not significant in the subgroup analysis of high quality trials (ρ = 0.14; OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.47, 1.12). The levosimendan cohort showed a significantly lower incidence of low-cardiac-output-syndrome (ρ
METHODS: All Apical HCM patients coming for clinic visits at the Institut Jantung Negara from September 2017 to September 2018 were included. We assessed their echocardiography images, grade their diastolic function and reviewed their ECG on presentation.
RESULTS: Fifty patient were included, 82% (n=41) were males and 18% (n=9) females. The diastolic function grading of 37 (74%) patients were able to be determined using the updated 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) diastolic guidelines. Fifty percent (n=25) had the typical ace-ofspades shape left ventricle (LV) appearance in diastole and 12% (n=6) had apical pouch. All patients had T inversion in the anterior leads of their ECG, and only 52% (n=26) fulfilled the ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) criteria. Majority of our patients presented with symptoms of chest pain (52%, n=26) and dyspnoea (42%, n=21).
CONCLUSION: The updated 2016 ASE guideline makes it easier to evaluate LV diastolic function in most patients with Apical HCM. It also helps in elucidating the aetiology of dyspnoea, based on left atrial pressure. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for Apical HCM when faced with deep T inversion on ECG, in addition to a thick LV apex with an aceof- spades appearance during diastole.
METHODS: Revascularised acute myocardial infarction patients with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function on TTE were assessed by 1.5T CMR. Acute regional diastolic wall motion abnormalities, global diastolic function measurements, acute segmental damage fraction with LGE and mean segmental pre-contrast T1 values were assessed on matching short axis slices.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients were analysed. Mean LVEF was 62.1±9.4%. No difference between NSTEMI (22/44) and STEMI in mean pre-contrast T1 values of infarcted (1025.0±109.2 vs 1011.0±81.6ms, p=0.70), adjacent (948.3±45.3 vs 941.1±46.6ms, p=0.70) and remote (888.8±52.8 vs 881.2±54.5ms, p=0.66) segments was detected. There was no correlation between pre-contrast T1 of infarcted segments with global diastolic dysfunction (E/A, r(2)=0.216, p=0.06; S/D, r(2)=0.243, p=0.053; E/E', r(2)=0.240, p=0.072), but there was significantly positive, moderate correlation with circumferential diastolic strain rate, (r(2)=0.579, p<0.01) with excellent agreement and reproducibility.
CONCLUSION: Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation of pre-contrast T1 values revealed no difference between NSTEMI and STEMI patients in terms of tissue characterisation post-myocardial infarction. However, pre-contrast T1 of infarcted tissue is significantly correlated with regional diastolic circumferential strain rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 396 subjects (198 NDHT, age and gender matched 198 normotensives; age, 30 to 50 years). Parameters of LVDF included Doppler-echocardiographic measurements of peak early (E) and late (A) diastolic velocities, E-wave deceleration time (DT) and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT). E/A ratio of <1 was taken as an indicative of DD.
RESULTS: Patients with NDHT had reduced E/A ratio (1.27 +/- 0.41 vs 1.37 +/- 0.35, P <0.001) and shortened DT (180.0 +/- 40.0 ms vs 190.0 +/- 30.0 ms, P = 0.025). The peak A velocity and IVRT were increased in the NDHT group [(62.73 +/- 13.82 ms vs 58.26 +/- 12.40 ms, P = 0.002) and (90.0 +/- 20.0 ms vs 80.0 +/- 10.0 ms, P <0.001), respectively]. Peak E velocity was similar in both groups. The prevalence of DD was increased in the NDHT group, 18.6% (32) vs 3.4% (6), P <0.001. Of the 32 NDHT subjects who had DD, 84.4% (27) had no left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and 15.7% (5) had LVH. Diastolic function was negatively correlated with age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and left ventricular mass index.
CONCLUSION: Impairment in LVDF occurs in NDHT which may precede structural abnormalities. Hypertension, obesity, older age and LVH are associated with worsening of diastolic function.