Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital
  • 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
  • 3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 4 Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia
  • 5 Center for Critical Care Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital
  • 6 Department of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
  • 7 Department of Emergency Medical System, Graduate School of Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan
  • 8 Department of Linguistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
  • 9 Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City
Int J Surg, 2023 May 01;109(5):1231-1238.
PMID: 37222717 DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000287

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The shock index (SI) predicts short-term mortality in trauma patients. Other shock indices have been developed to improve discriminant accuracy. The authors examined the discriminant ability of the SI, modified SI (MSI), and reverse SI multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) on short-term mortality and functional outcomes.

METHODS: The authors evaluated a cohort of adult trauma patients transported to emergency departments. The first vital signs were used to calculate the SI, MSI, and rSIG. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves and test results were used to compare the discriminant performance of the indices on short-term mortality and poor functional outcomes. A subgroup analysis of geriatric patients with traumatic brain injury, penetrating injury, and nonpenetrating injury was performed.

RESULTS: A total of 105 641 patients (49±20 years, 62% male) met the inclusion criteria. The rSIG had the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for short-term mortality (0.800, CI: 0.791-0.809) and poor functional outcome (0.596, CI: 0.590-0.602). The cutoff for rSIG was 18 for short-term mortality and poor functional outcomes with sensitivities of 0.668 and 0.371 and specificities of 0.805 and 0.813, respectively. The positive predictive values were 9.57% and 22.31%, and the negative predictive values were 98.74% and 89.97%. rSIG also had better discriminant ability in geriatrics, traumatic brain injury, and nonpenetrating injury.

CONCLUSION: The rSIG with a cutoff of 18 was accurate for short-term mortality in Asian adult trauma patients. Moreover, rSIG discriminates poor functional outcomes better than the commonly used SI and MSI.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.