Affiliations 

  • 1 Wildlife Impact, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
  • 2 HUTAN, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
  • 3 Borneo Futures, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam
  • 4 OrangJUGA, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • 5 Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
  • 6 Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, Canada
  • 7 Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom
  • 8 Independent Conservation Consultant, Lannion, France
  • 9 IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Section on Great Apes, c/o Re:wild, Austin, Texas, United States of America
  • 10 School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
PLoS One, 2025;20(3).
PMID: 40106428 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317862

Abstract

Wild orangutans (Pongo spp.) are captured and moved (wild-to-wild translocated) primarily to prevent crop foraging or out of concern for orangutans' survival in fragmented habitat. Little is known about wild-to-wild translocation frequency, circumstances, and possible species conservation and individual welfare outcomes. We investigated orangutan wild-to-wild translocations in Indonesia from 2005 to 2022 using primarily data from public sources and consultation with practitioners. At least 988 wild orangutans were captured for translocation during the study period, including many reproductively valuable resident females and adult males removed from unprotected fragmented forests and forest patches. Data on health condition (n = 808) indicated 81.7% were reported as healthy at time of capture. Information on post-capture disposition (n = 268) showed that only 23% were translocated immediately. Mean estimated killing combined with reported translocation removals was calculated to affect 3.3% of orangutans in Kalimantan, and 11.6% in Sumatra, both higher than the threshold of mortality from human actions expected to drive populations to extinction. Negative impacts are likely compounded where multiple individuals are translocated from the same area, and for the Tapanuli orangutan (P. tapanuliensis), which has the smallest population and range of all orangutan species. Data on reasons for capture (n = 743) indicated most translocations (69%) were conducted to address crop foraging and orangutan presence in or around croplands and plantations. Forest cover analysis around 104 orangutan capture sites with high resolution spatial information indicated that deforestation levels in the year preceding capture were not significantly associated with likelihood of captures for translocation. To improve conservation outcomes, wild-to-wild translocations should be used only in exceptional circumstances. Most orangutans should instead be monitored and protected in situ by addressing conflicts and maintaining the forests, including forest fragments, they are using. When translocation is necessary, post-release survival and potential conservation impacts must be monitored.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.