Affiliations 

  • 1 IPATIMUP (Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto), Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
  • 2 Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
  • 3 Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, Acton ACT, Canberra, 2601, Australia
  • 4 Department of Biological Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK
  • 5 Archaeology Department, University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
  • 6 Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania Museum, 3260 South St., Philadelphia, USA
  • 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan
  • 8 Centre for Global Archaeological Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • 9 Malaysian Institute of Pharmaceuticals and Nutraceuticals Malaysia, National Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • 10 School of Anthropology, Institute of Human Sciences, The Pauling Centre, University of Oxford, 58a Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6QS, UK
  • 11 Department of Biological Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK. m.b.richards@hud.ac.uk
Hum Genet, 2016 Apr;135(4):363-76.
PMID: 26875094 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-016-1640-3

Abstract

There has been a long-standing debate concerning the extent to which the spread of Neolithic ceramics and Malay-Polynesian languages in Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) were coupled to an agriculturally driven demic dispersal out of Taiwan 4000 years ago (4 ka). We previously addressed this question using founder analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control-region sequences to identify major lineage clusters most likely to have dispersed from Taiwan into ISEA, proposing that the dispersal had a relatively minor impact on the extant genetic structure of ISEA, and that the role of agriculture in the expansion of the Austronesian languages was therefore likely to have been correspondingly minor. Here we test these conclusions by sequencing whole mtDNAs from across Taiwan and ISEA, using their higher chronological precision to resolve the overall proportion that participated in the "out-of-Taiwan" mid-Holocene dispersal as opposed to earlier, postglacial expansions in the Early Holocene. We show that, in total, about 20 % of mtDNA lineages in the modern ISEA pool result from the "out-of-Taiwan" dispersal, with most of the remainder signifying earlier processes, mainly due to sea-level rises after the Last Glacial Maximum. Notably, we show that every one of these founder clusters previously entered Taiwan from China, 6-7 ka, where rice-farming originated, and remained distinct from the indigenous Taiwanese population until after the subsequent dispersal into ISEA.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.