Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Chemistry, Sri Nandhanam College of Engineering and Technology, Tirupattur 635 601, Tamil Nadu, India. Electronic address: prabuphd13@gmail.com
  • 2 Integrative Medicine Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, SAINS@ Bertam, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, 13200, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia; University of Malaya Centre for Ionic Liquids, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
  • 5 School of Chemical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Glugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • 6 Low Dimensional Materials Research Centre, Department of Physics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
  • 7 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia; University of Malaya Centre for Ionic Liquids, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia. Electronic address: sharifahm@um.edu.my
Carbohydr Res, 2020 Nov;497:108138.
PMID: 32911205 DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2020.108138

Abstract

The behavior of the inclusion behavior of guanosine (GU) with beta-cyclodextrin (β-CD) in the liquid, solid and virtual state were investigated. The absorption and fluorescence spectral were used to determine the inclusion behavior in liquid state. FT-IR, NMR, TGA, DSC, PXRD and FESEM techniques were used to investigate the inclusion behavior in solid-state, meanwhile the virtual state studies are done by molecular docking. The solid inclusion complex (GU: β-CD) was prepared by using the co-precipitation method. The binding constant (K) of (GU: β-CD) was calculated by using Benesi-Hildebrand. Besides that, the 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of inclusion complex was confirmed by using the Benesi-Hildebrand plot and Job's plot of continuous variation method. The most preferable model of GU: β-CD that suggested via molecular docking studies was in good agreement with experimental results. The inclusion complex of GU: β-CD exerted its toxicity effects towards HepG2 cell lines based on the reduced number of cell viability and lowest IC50 value compared to the GU and β-CD viability.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications