Affiliations 

  • 1 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • 2 American Eye Centre, Ho Chi Min, Vietnam
  • 3 Surgical Retinal Department of the Singapore National Eye Centre; Clinician scientist, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 4 Alphavision Augenzentrum Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 5 National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital; Adjunct associate professor, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
  • 6 Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 7 Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital; Chief, Alexandria Hospital Eye Surgery Center, Singapore
  • 8 University of the Philippines and Medical Director, Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute in Makati, Philippines
  • 9 Chong Hua Hospital, Cebu; Head, Retina section, Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center, Philippines
  • 10 The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines
  • 11 National Head, Ophthalmology Service, Ministry of Health Malaysia; Ophthalmology Service, Ministry of Health Malaysia; Head of Department, Ophthalmology Unit, Hospital Shah Alam, Malaysia
  • 12 The Eye and Retina Surgeons, Camden Medical Center, Singapore
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila), 2020;9(5):426-434.
PMID: 32956188 DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000312

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this consensus article was to provide comprehensive recommendations in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) by reviewing recent clinical evidence.

DESIGN: A questionnaire containing 47 questions was developed which encompassed clinical scenarios such as treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and steroid, treatment side effects, as well as cost and compliance/reimbursement in the management of DME using a Dephi questionnaire as guide.

METHODS: An expert panel of 12 retinal specialists from Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India and Vietnam responded to this questionnaire on two separate occasions. The first round responses were compiled, analyzed and discussed in a round table discussion where a consensus was sought through voting. Consensus was considered achieved, when 9 of the 12 panellists (75%) agreed on a recommendation.

RESULTS: The DME patients were initially profiled based on their response to treatment, and the terms target response, adequate response, nonresponse, and inadequate response were defined. The panellists arrived at a consensus on various aspects of DME treatment such as need for classification of patients before treatment, first-line treatment options, appropriate time to switch between treatment modalities, and steroid-related side effects based on which recommendations were derived, and a treatment algorithm was developed.

CONCLUSIONS: This consensus article provides comprehensive, evidence-based treatment guidelines in the management of DME in Asian population. In addition, it also provides recommendations on other aspects of DME management such as steroid treatment for stable glaucoma patients, management of intraocular pressure rise, and recommendations for cataract development.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.