METHODS: A user-friendly software was developed to accurately predict the individual size-specific dose estimation of paediatric patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) scans of the head, thorax, and abdomen. The software includes a calculation equation developed based on a novel SSDE prediction equation that used a population's pre-determined percentage difference between volume-weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and SSDE with age. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM RPT 204) method (manual) and segmentation-based SSDE calculators (indoseCT and XXautocalc) were used to assess the proposed software predictions comparatively.
RESULTS: The results of this study show that the automated equation-based calculation of SSDE and the manual and segmentation-based calculation of SSDE are in good agreement for patients. The differences between the automated equation-based calculation of SSDE and the manual and segmentation-based calculation are less than 3%.
CONCLUSION: This study validated an accurate SSDE calculator that allows users to enter key input values and calculate SSDE.
IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: The automated equation-based SSDE software (PESSD) seems a promising tool for estimating individualised CT doses during CT scans.
MATERIALS & METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from all patients who underwent both CT examinations - brain (frontal bone), thorax (T7), abdomen (L3), spine (T7 & L3) or pelvis (left hip) - and DXA between 2014 and 2018 in our centre. To ensure comparability, the period between CT and DXA studies must not exceed one year. Correlations between HU values and t-scores were calculated using Pearson's correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine threshold HU values for predicting osteoporosis.
RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 1043 CT examinations (136 head, 537 thorax, 159 lumbar and 151 left hip). The left hip consistently provided the most robust correlations (r = 0.664-0.708, p thorax T7 and lumbar L3 showed average correlations (range of r values is 0.497-0.679, p 0.05.
CONCLUSION: HU values derived from the hip, T7 and L3 provided a good to moderate correlation to t-scores with a good prediction for osteoporosis. The suggested optimal thresholds may be used in clinical settings after external validations are performed.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this paper is to develop a robust algorithm to extract respiration rate using the contactless displacement sensor.
METHODS: In this study, chest movements were used as an indicative of inspiration and expiration to measure respiratory rate using the contactless displacement sensor. The contactless optical signals were recorded from 32 healthy subjects in four different controlled breathing conditions: rest, coughing, talking and hand movement to obtain the motion artifacts that the patients may have in the emergency department. The Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) algorithm was used to derive continuous RR signal from the contactless optical signal.
RESULTS: The analysis showed that there is a good correlation (0.9702) with RMSE of 0.33 breaths per minutes between the contact respiration rate and contactless respiration rate using empirical mode decomposition method.
CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the empirical mode decomposition method can extract the respiration rate of the contactless optical signal from chest movement.