MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of SMO in 112 bladder cancer cases and determine their association with demographic and clinicopathological parameters. Bladder cancer tissues were obtained from the Hospital Kuala Lumpur.
RESULTS: SMO was expressed in the cytoplasm of all cases of bladder cancer. 6 cases (5.4%) showed low expression, while 106 cases (94.6%) showed high expression. Positive expression of SMO protein was correlated with a few variables which include grade and stage of tumour, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. SMO expression showed statistically significant association with higher grade (p=0.001) and higher stage (p=0.042) of bladder cancer. SMO expression also showed borderline association with lymph node metastasis (p=0.056).
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that SMO expression may be a poor prognostic marker in bladder cancer.
CASE: A 60-year-old woman presented with abdominal discomfort and hyperleukocytosis. She was diagnosed as CML in the chronic phase with positive BCR-ABL1 transcripts. Due to the failure to obtain an optimal response with imatinib treatment, it was switched to nilotinib. She responded well to nilotinib initially and achieved complete haematological and cytogenetic responses, with undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts. However, in 4 years she developed molecular relapse. Mutation analysis which was done 70 months after commencement of nilotinib showed the presence of BCRABL1 kinase domain mutation with nucleotide substitution at position 1187 from Histidine(H) to Proline(P) (H396P). Currently, she is on nilotinib 400mg twice daily. Her latest molecular analysis showed the presence of residual BCR-ABL1 transcripts at 0.22%.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the importance of BCR-ABL1 mutation analysis in CML patients with persistent BCR-ABL1 positivity in spite of treatment. Early detection and identification of the type of BCRABL1 mutation are important to guide appropriate treatment options as different mutation will have different sensitivity to TKI.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of adult CML patients (citizen) in a single but representative centre in southern Sarawak.
RESULTS: Total 79 patients (Malay 39%, Chinese 30.4%, Iban 17.7%, Bidayuh 12.7%) were identified from the databases. Median age at diagnosis was younger, 40, compared to developed countries due to population structure. M:F ratio was higher, 2.6:1 compared to other countries 1.3-1.7:1. Majority presented at chronic phase (89.5%), low/intermediate risk score (80%) and started imatinib (96%) as first line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which 40% of them switched to other TKI due to intolerance (17%) and failure (including disease progression)/not achieving major molecular response (83%). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assessment after three months of TKI treatment had higher positive predictive value to predict Imatinib failure, 75%, than qPCR assessment after six months of TKI treatment, 58%. Presenting phase, symptoms, signs and laboratory data were like most countries. Estimated prevalence and incidence of CML in southern Sarawak was 69.2/1,000,000 population at the Year 2016 (similar to most developing countries) and 8.0/1,000,000 population per year at the Year 2011-2016 (similar to most countries), respectively. The incidence increased with age and was lowest among Iban, 12.8 and highest among Chinese, 19.5, which was 4x higher than Chinese in China. The prevalence of different BCR-ABL1 transcript type was like other Asia countries CONCLUSION: Significant epidemiological differences on M:F ratio and ethnic groups compared to other countries warrant further study.